BACKGROUND: Electrically based therapies for terminating atrial fibrillation (AF) currently fall into 2 categories: antitachycardia pacing and cardioversion. Antitachycardia pacing uses low-intensity pacing stimuli delivered via a single electrode and is effective for terminating slower tachycardias but is less effective for treating AF. In contrast, cardioversion uses a single high-voltage shock to terminate AF reliably, but the voltages required produce undesirable side effects, including tissue damage and pain. We propose a new method to terminate AF called far-field antifibrillation pacing, which delivers a short train of low-intensity electric pulses at the frequency of antitachycardia pacing but from field electrodes. Prior theoretical work has suggested that this approach can create a large number of activation sites ("virtual" electrodes) that emit propagating waves within the tissue without implanting physical electrodes and thereby may be more effective than point-source stimulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using optical mapping in isolated perfused canine atrial preparations, we show that a series of pulses at low field strength (0.9 to 1.4 V/cm) is sufficient to entrain and subsequently extinguish AF with a success rate of 93% (69 of 74 trials in 8 preparations). We further demonstrate that the mechanism behind far-field antifibrillation pacing success is the generation of wave emission sites within the tissue by the applied electric field, which entrains the tissue as the field is pulsed. CONCLUSIONS: AF in our model can be terminated by far-field antifibrillation pacing with only 13% of the energy required for cardioversion. Further studies are needed to determine whether this marked reduction in energy can increase the effectiveness and safety of terminating atrial tachyarrhythmias clinically.
BACKGROUND: Electrically based therapies for terminating atrial fibrillation (AF) currently fall into 2 categories: antitachycardia pacing and cardioversion. Antitachycardia pacing uses low-intensity pacing stimuli delivered via a single electrode and is effective for terminating slower tachycardias but is less effective for treating AF. In contrast, cardioversion uses a single high-voltage shock to terminate AF reliably, but the voltages required produce undesirable side effects, including tissue damage and pain. We propose a new method to terminate AF called far-field antifibrillation pacing, which delivers a short train of low-intensity electric pulses at the frequency of antitachycardia pacing but from field electrodes. Prior theoretical work has suggested that this approach can create a large number of activation sites ("virtual" electrodes) that emit propagating waves within the tissue without implanting physical electrodes and thereby may be more effective than point-source stimulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using optical mapping in isolated perfused canine atrial preparations, we show that a series of pulses at low field strength (0.9 to 1.4 V/cm) is sufficient to entrain and subsequently extinguish AF with a success rate of 93% (69 of 74 trials in 8 preparations). We further demonstrate that the mechanism behind far-field antifibrillation pacing success is the generation of wave emission sites within the tissue by the applied electric field, which entrains the tissue as the field is pulsed. CONCLUSIONS:AF in our model can be terminated by far-field antifibrillation pacing with only 13% of the energy required for cardioversion. Further studies are needed to determine whether this marked reduction in energy can increase the effectiveness and safety of terminating atrial tachyarrhythmias clinically.
Authors: Darren A Hooks; Karl A Tomlinson; Scott G Marsden; Ian J LeGrice; Bruce H Smaill; Andrew J Pullan; Peter J Hunter Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-08-23 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Anne M Gillis; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Herwig Schmidinger; Santini Massimo; Kevin Wolfe; Deborah J Kavaney; Mary F Otterness; Stefan H Hohnloser Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-11-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: James Kneller; Renqiang Zou; Edward J Vigmond; Zhiguo Wang; L Joshua Leon; Stanley Nattel Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-05-17 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: R Ricci; C Pignalberi; M Disertori; A Capucci; L Padeletti; G Botto; S Toscano; F Miraglia; A Grammatico; M Santini Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Olaf Dössel; Martin W Krueger; Frank M Weber; Mathias Wilhelms; Gunnar Seemann Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Philip Bittihn; Amgad Squires; Gisa Luther; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Valentin Krinsky; Ulrich Parlitz; Stefan Luther Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jean Bragard; Ana Simic; Jorge Elorza; Roman O Grigoriev; Elizabeth M Cherry; Robert F Gilmour; Niels F Otani; Flavio H Fenton Journal: Chaos Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.642
Authors: J Christoph; M Chebbok; C Richter; J Schröder-Schetelig; P Bittihn; S Stein; I Uzelac; F H Fenton; G Hasenfuß; R F Gilmour; S Luther Journal: Nature Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 49.962