Literature DB >> 20923639

Probing field-induced tissue polarization using transillumination fluorescent imaging.

Bryan J Caldwell1, Marcel Wellner, Bogdan G Mitrea, Arkady M Pertsov, Christian W Zemlin.   

Abstract

Despite major successes of biophysical theories in predicting the effects of electrical shocks within the heart, recent optical mapping studies have revealed two major discrepancies between theory and experiment: 1), the presence of negative bulk polarization recorded during strong shocks; and 2), the unexpectedly small surface polarization under shock electrodes. There is little consensus as to whether these differences result from deficiencies of experimental techniques, artifacts of tissue damage, or deficiencies of existing theories. Here, we take advantage of recently developed near-infrared voltage-sensitive dyes and transillumination optical imaging to perform, for the first time that we know of, noninvasive probing of field effects deep inside the intact ventricular wall. This technique removes some of the limitations encountered in previous experimental studies. We explicitly demonstrate that deep inside intact myocardial tissue preparations, strong electrical shocks do produce considerable negative bulk polarization previously inferred from surface recordings. We also demonstrate that near-threshold diastolic field stimulation produces activation of deep myocardial layers 2-6 mm away from the cathodal surface, contrary to theory. Using bidomain simulations we explore factors that may improve the agreement between theory and experiment. We show that the inclusion of negative asymmetric current can qualitatively explain negative bulk polarization in a discontinuous bidomain model.
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923639      PMCID: PMC3042586          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  40 in total

1.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; F Aguel; Y Cheng; B Wollenzier; N Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  High-resolution optical mapping of intramural virtual electrodes in porcine left ventricular wall.

Authors:  Oleg F Sharifov; Raymond E Ideker; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  Do intramural virtual electrodes facilitate successful defibrillation? Model-based analysis of experimental evidence.

Authors:  Darren A Hooks; Mark L Trew; Bruce H Smaill; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03

4.  Role of intramural virtual electrodes in shock-induced activation of left ventricle: optical measurements from the intact epicardial surface.

Authors:  Oleg F Sharifov; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Three distinct directions of intramural activation reveal nonuniform side-to-side electrical coupling of ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Mark L Trew; Gregory B Sands; Darren A Hooks; Ian J LeGrice; Bruce H Smaill
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06-18

6.  Optical action potential upstroke morphology reveals near-surface transmural propagation direction.

Authors:  Christopher J Hyatt; Sergey F Mironov; Frederick J Vetter; Christian W Zemlin; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain.

Authors:  N G Sepulveda; B J Roth; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Effect of microscopic and macroscopic discontinuities on the response of cardiac tissue to defibrillating (stimulating) currents.

Authors:  R Plonsey; R C Barr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Diverse effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells and tissues.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Jody White; Peter F Blackmore; Yuping Deng; Kenneth Somers; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.311

10.  Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio H Fenton; Stefan Luther; Elizabeth M Cherry; Niels F Otani; Valentin Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Robert F Gilmour
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new optrode design for intramural optical recordings.

Authors:  Wei Kong; Andrew E Pollard; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Toward microendoscopy-inspired cardiac optogenetics in vivo: technical overview and perspective.

Authors:  Aleksandra Klimas; Emilia Entcheva
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Johanna U Neuber; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-12-12

4.  Quantification of the transmural dynamics of atrial fibrillation by simultaneous endocardial and epicardial optical mapping in an acute sheep model.

Authors:  Sarah R Gutbrod; Richard Walton; Stephen Gilbert; Valentin Meillet; Pierre Jaïs; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haïssaguerre; Rémi Dubois; Olivier Bernus; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-24

5.  Cardiac response to low-energy field pacing challenges the standard theory of defibrillation.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Mark L Trew; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-15

6.  Instrumentation in Diffuse Optical Imaging.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhang
Journal:  Photonics       Date:  2014-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.