Literature DB >> 24387558

Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols.

Jean Bragard1, Ana Simic1, Jorge Elorza1, Roman O Grigoriev2, Elizabeth M Cherry3, Robert F Gilmour4, Niels F Otani3, Flavio H Fenton2.   

Abstract

In this article, we compare quantitatively the efficiency of three different protocols commonly used in commercial defibrillators. These are based on monophasic and both symmetric and asymmetric biphasic shocks. A numerical one-dimensional model of cardiac tissue using the bidomain formulation is used in order to test the different protocols. In particular, we performed a total of 4.8 × 10(6) simulations by varying shock waveform, shock energy, initial conditions, and heterogeneity in internal electrical conductivity. Whenever the shock successfully removed the reentrant dynamics in the tissue, we classified the mechanism. The analysis of the numerical data shows that biphasic shocks are significantly more efficient (by about 25%) than the corresponding monophasic ones. We determine that the increase in efficiency of the biphasic shocks can be explained by the higher proportion of newly excited tissue through the mechanism of direct activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24387558      PMCID: PMC3843767          DOI: 10.1063/1.4829632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chaos        ISSN: 1054-1500            Impact factor:   3.642


  34 in total

1.  The biphasic mystery: why a biphasic shock is more effective than a monophasic shock for defibrillation.

Authors:  J P Keener; T J Lewis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Resetting and annihilation of reentrant activity in a model of a one-dimensional loop of ventricular tissue.

Authors:  Philippe Comtois; Alain Vinet
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.642

3.  Electroporation and shock-induced transmembrane potential in a cardiac fiber during defibrillation strength shocks.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Cardiac responses to premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli. Results from cell and tissue modeling studies.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; L Tung; N V Thakor
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Defibrillation depends on conductivity fluctuations and the degree of disorganization in reentry patterns.

Authors:  Gernot Plank; L Joshua Leon; Shane Kimber; Edward J Vigmond
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-02

6.  Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration.

Authors:  A S Tang; S Yabe; J M Wharton; M Dolker; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation: impact of new experimental defibrillator waveforms.

Authors:  S M Blanchard; R E Ideker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Termination of reentrant cardiac action potential propagation using far-field electrical pacing.

Authors:  Niels F Otani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Termination of atrial fibrillation using pulsed low-energy far-field stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio H Fenton; Stefan Luther; Elizabeth M Cherry; Niels F Otani; Valentin Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Robert F Gilmour
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Low-energy control of electrical turbulence in the heart.

Authors:  Stefan Luther; Flavio H Fenton; Bruce G Kornreich; Amgad Squires; Philip Bittihn; Daniel Hornung; Markus Zabel; James Flanders; Andrea Gladuli; Luis Campoy; Elizabeth M Cherry; Gisa Luther; Gerd Hasenfuss; Valentin I Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Robert F Gilmour; Eberhard Bodenschatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Real-time interactive simulations of large-scale systems on personal computers and cell phones: Toward patient-specific heart modeling and other applications.

Authors:  Abouzar Kaboudian; Elizabeth M Cherry; Flavio H Fenton
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 14.136

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.