Literature DB >> 12164452

Internal defibrillation: pain perception of low energy shocks.

David M Steinhaus1, Debbie S Cardinal, Luc Mongeon, Shailesh Kumar Musley, Laura Foley, Susie Corrigan.   

Abstract

Recently, device-based low energy cardoversion shocks have been used as therapy for AF. However, discomfort from internal low energy electrical shocks is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain perception with low energy internal discharges. Eighteen patients with ICD devices for malignant ventricular arrhythmias were recruited to receive shocks of 0.4 and 2 J in the nonsedated state. Discharges were delivered in a blinded, random order and questionnaires were used to determine discomfort levels and tolerability. Patients perceived discharges at these energies as relatively uncomfortable, averaging a score of 7.3 on a discomfort scale of 0-10, and could not distinguish 0.4-J shocks from 2-J shocks. Second shocks were perceived as more uncomfortable than initial discharges, regardless of the order in which the shocks were delivered. Despite the perceived discomfort, 83% of patients stated that they would tolerate discharges of this magnitude once per month, and 44% would tolerate weekly discharges. Patients perceive low energy discharges as painful and cannot distinguish between shocks of 0.4 and 2 J. The results suggest that ICD systems developed to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias should minimize the number of shocks delivered to terminate an atrial tachyarrhythmia episode. The majority of the patients tolerated low energy shocks provided the discharges are infrequent (once per month).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12164452     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01090.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  22 in total

1.  Recollection of pain due to inappropriate versus appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Gregory M Marcus; Derrick W Chan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  Effective communication and ethical consent in decisions related to ICDs.

Authors:  Alexander M Clark; Tiny Jaarsma; Patricia Strachan; Patricia M Davidson; Megan Jerke; James M Beattie; Amanda S Duncan; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  A Novel Defibrillation Tool: Percutaneously Delivered, Partially Insulated Epicardial Defibrillation.

Authors:  Ammar M Killu; Niyada Naksuk; Zdeněk Stárek; Christopher V DeSimone; Faisal F Syed; Prakriti Gaba; Jiří Wolf; Frantisek Lehar; Martin Pesl; Pavel Leinveber; Michal Crha; Dorothy Ladewig; Joanne Powers; Scott Suddendorf; David O Hodge; Gaurav Satam; Miroslav Novák; Tomas Kara; Charles J Bruce; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07

Review 4.  Do arrhythmias still deserve our intellectual efforts?: The 2002 Wenckebach Lecture of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Low-energy multistage atrial defibrillation therapy terminates atrial fibrillation with less energy than a single shock.

Authors:  Wenwen Li; Ajit H Janardhan; Vadim V Fedorov; Qun Sha; Richard B Schuessler; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-10-06

6.  Internal atrial and ventricular defibrillation during electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Internal defibrillation: where we have been and where we should be going?

Authors:  Samuel Lévy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Is An Atrial Defibrillator Still An Option In Treating Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Ziad El Khoury; Deepak Bhakta
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-02-12

9.  The circadian variation of atrial defibrillation thresholds.

Authors:  Andrew Robert John Mitchell; Eduardo Warman; Katie Schaaf; Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Atrial fibrillation: the role of atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Renato Ricci
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.