Literature DB >> 12527095

Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies.

Jonas Obleser1, Thomas Elbert, Aditi Lahiri, Carsten Eulitz.   

Abstract

We studied neuromagnetic correlates of the processing of German vowels [a], [e] and [i]. The aim was (i) to show an influence of acoustic/phonetic features on timing and mapping of the N100 m component and (ii) to demonstrate the retest reliability of these parameters. To assess the spatial configuration of the N100 m generators, Euclidean distances between vowel sources were computed. Latency, amplitude, and source locations of the N100 m component differed between vowels. The acoustically most dissimilar vowels [a] and [i] showed more distant source locations than the more similar vowels [e] and [i]. This pattern of results was reliably found in a second experimental session after at least 5 days. The results suggest the preservation of spectral dissimilarities as mapped in a F(1)-F(2) vowel space in a cortical representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12527095     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00193-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  15 in total

1.  Task difficulty modulates age-related differences in the behavioral and neural bases of language production.

Authors:  Haoyun Zhang; Anna Eppes; Michele T Diaz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  You had me at "Hello": Rapid extraction of dialect information from spoken words.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  To what extent do we hear phonemic contrasts in a non-native regional variety? Tracking the dynamics of perceptual processing with EEG.

Authors:  Sophie Dufour; Angèle Brunellière; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

4.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: sensor- and source-space data.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Jennifer Merickel; Joshua Riley; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Vowel sound extraction in anterior superior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Henning Boecker; Alexander Drzezga; Bernhard Haslinger; Andreas Hennenlotter; Michael Roettinger; Carsten Eulitz; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  The maps problem and the mapping problem: two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language.

Authors:  David Poeppel
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Categorical effects in fricative perception are reflected in cortical source information.

Authors:  Sol Lago; Mathias Scharinger; Yakov Kronrod; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds.

Authors:  Ismo Miettinen; Hannu Tiitinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Christine Etler; Shuman He; Sara O'Brien; Sheryl Erenberg; Jae-Ryong Kim; Aayesha N Dhuldhoya; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.