Literature DB >> 19906958

Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Alexandra Parbery-Clark1, Erika Skoe, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Musicians have lifelong experience parsing melodies from background harmonies, which can be considered a process analogous to speech perception in noise. To investigate the effect of musical experience on the neural representation of speech-in-noise, we compared subcortical neurophysiological responses to speech in quiet and noise in a group of highly trained musicians and nonmusician controls. Musicians were found to have a more robust subcortical representation of the acoustic stimulus in the presence of noise. Specifically, musicians demonstrated faster neural timing, enhanced representation of speech harmonics, and less degraded response morphology in noise. Neural measures were associated with better behavioral performance on the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for which musicians outperformed the nonmusician controls. These findings suggest that musical experience limits the negative effects of competing background noise, thereby providing the first biological evidence for musicians' perceptual advantage for speech-in-noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19906958      PMCID: PMC6665054          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3256-09.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians.

Authors:  S Koelsch; E Schröger; M Tervaniemi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians.

Authors:  C Pantev; L E Roberts; M Schulz; A Engelien; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  J Cunningham; T Nicol; S G Zecker; A Bradlow; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Dyslexia and music: measuring musical timing skills.

Authors:  Katie Overy; Roderick I Nicolson; Angela J Fawcett; Eric F Clarke
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2003-02

Review 5.  Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Christo Pantev; Bernhard Ross; Takkao Fujioka; Laurel J Trainor; Michael Schulte; Matthias Schulz
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Gabriella Musacchia; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems.

Authors:  Erin A Hayes; Catherine M Warrier; Trent G Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  Effects of musical training on the auditory cortex in children.

Authors:  Laurel J Trainor; Antoine Shahin; Larry E Roberts
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems.

Authors:  Brad Wible; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  146 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Viorica Marian; Anthony Shook; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

7.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

Review 10.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.