Literature DB >> 19597804

Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

David Burr1, Martin S Banks, Maria Concetta Morrone.   

Abstract

The "ventriloquist effect" refers to the fact that vision usually dominates hearing in spatial localization, and this has been shown to be consistent with optimal integration of visual and auditory signals (Alais and Burr in Curr Biol 14(3):257-262, 2004). For temporal localization, however, auditory stimuli often "capture" visual stimuli, in what has become known as "temporal ventriloquism". We examined this quantitatively using a bisection task, confirming that sound does tend to dominate the perceived timing of audio-visual stimuli. The dominance was predicted qualitatively by considering the better temporal localization of audition, but the quantitative fit was less than perfect, with more weight being given to audition than predicted from thresholds. As predicted by optimal cue combination, the temporal localization of audio-visual stimuli was better than for either sense alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597804     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1933-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

2.  AUDITORY FLUTTER-DRIVING OF VISUAL FLICKER.

Authors:  T SHIPLEY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

4.  Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions.

Authors:  Tobias S Andersen; Kaisa Tiippana; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11

5.  Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Dynamic visual capture: apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target.

Authors:  S Mateeff; J Hohnsbein; T Noack
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses.

Authors:  D H Warren; R B Welch; T J McCarthy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

8.  The detection of auditory visual desynchrony.

Authors:  N F Dixon; L Spitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Overconfidence in an objective anticipatory motor task.

Authors:  Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

10.  Neural correlates of audiovisual motion capture.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  79 in total

1.  Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; John R Iversen; Allen Zhang; Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-26

2.  Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval.

Authors:  Zhuanghua Shi; Lihan Chen; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Supramodal representation of temporal priors calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Huihui Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

5.  Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Harriet Lloyd; Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hearing the speed: visual motion biases the perception of auditory tempo.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Donatas Jonikaitis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

8.  Action enhances auditory but not visual temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?

Authors:  Daniel Bratzke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.