Literature DB >> 31059487

Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Alexandra N Scurry1, Tiziana Vercillo2, Alexis Nicholson1, Michael Webster1, Fang Jiang1.   

Abstract

Encoding the temporal properties of external signals that comprise multimodal events is a major factor guiding everyday experience. However, during the natural aging process, impairments to sensory processing can profoundly affect multimodal temporal perception. Various mechanisms can contribute to temporal perception, and thus it is imperative to understand how each can be affected by age. In the current study, using three different temporal order judgement tasks (unisensory, multisensory, and sensorimotor), we investigated the effects of age on two separate temporal processes: synchronization and integration of multiple signals. These two processes rely on different aspects of temporal information, either the temporal alignment of processed signals or the integration/segregation of signals arising from different modalities, respectively. Results showed that the ability to integrate/segregate multiple signals decreased with age regardless of the task, and that the magnitude of such impairment correlated across tasks, suggesting a widespread mechanism affected by age. In contrast, perceptual synchrony remained stable with age, revealing a distinct intact mechanism. Overall, results from this study suggest that aging has differential effects on temporal processing, and general impairments with aging may impact global temporal sensitivity while context-dependent processes remain unaffected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multisensory integration; aging; sensorimotor integration; time perception

Year:  2019        PMID: 31059487      PMCID: PMC6602877          DOI: 10.1163/22134808-20191343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  113 in total

1.  Dissecting the brain's internal clock: how frontal-striatal circuitry keeps time and shifts attention.

Authors:  Warren H Meck; Aimee M Benson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  When is now? Perception of simultaneity.

Authors:  J V Stone; N M Hunkin; J Porrill; R Wood; V Keeler; M Beanland; M Port; N R Porter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neural basis of aging: the penetration of cognition into action control.

Authors:  Sofie Heuninckx; Nicole Wenderoth; Filiep Debaere; Ronald Peeters; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.

Authors:  Pilar Andrés; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Carles Escera
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Improving the efficiency of multisensory integration in older adults: audio-visual temporal discrimination training reduces susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Annalisa Setti; John Stapleton; Daniel Leahy; Cathal Walsh; Rose Anne Kenny; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  William J Matthews; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Dopaminergic modulation of striato-frontal connectivity during motor timing in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Marjan Jahanshahi; Catherine R G Jones; Jan Zijlmans; Regina Katzenschlager; Lucy Lee; Niall Quinn; Chris D Frith; Andrew J Lees
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal discrimination.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Randall W Engle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sensory dominance and multisensory integration as screening tools in aging.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Alison F Eardley; Trudi Edginton; Rebecca Oyekan; Emily Smyth; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Task-dependent audiovisual temporal sensitivity is not affected by stimulus intensity levels.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Zachary Lovelady; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Impoverished Inhibitory Control Exacerbates Multisensory Impairments in Older Fallers.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Zachary Lovelady; Daniela M Lemus; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.