Literature DB >> 15751474

Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Peter Ulric Tse1, James Intriligator, Josée Rivest, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

During brief, dangerous events, such as car accidents and robberies, many people report that events seem to pass in slow motion, as if time had slowed down. We have measured a similar, although less dramatic, effect in response to unexpected, nonthreatening events. We attribute the subjective expansion of time to the engagement of attention and its influence on the amount of perceptual information processed. We term the effect time's subjective expansion (TSE) and examine here the objective temporal dynamics of these distortions. When a series of stimuli are shown in succession, the low-probability oddball stimulus in the series tends to last subjectively longer than the high-probability stimulus even when they last the same objective duration. In particular, (1) there is a latency of at least 120 msec between stimulus onset and the onset of TSE, which may be preceded by subjective temporal contraction; (2) there is a peak in TSE at which subjective time is particularly distorted at a latency of 225 msec after stimulus onset; and (3) the temporal dynamics of TSE are approximately the same in the visual and the auditory domains. Two control experiments (in which the methods of magnitude estimation and stimulus reproduction were used) replicated the temporal dynamics of TSE revealed by the method of constant stimuli, although the initial peak was not apparent with these methods. In addition, a third, control experiment (in which the method of single stimuli was used) showed that TSE in the visual domain can occur because of semantic novelty, rather than image novelty per se. Overall, the results support the view that attentional orienting underlies distortions in perceived duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15751474     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  124 in total

1.  Using Time Perception to Measure Fitness for Duty.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  2009-01-01

2.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing.

Authors:  Shinobu Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Naoki Kawakami; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Spatial maps for time and motion.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Morrone; Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Perceptual latency priming: a measure of attentional facilitation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

Review 8.  A presentation of attentional semantics.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-08-04

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Brief subjective durations contract with repetition.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.