Literature DB >> 22638726

Synchronization with competing visual and auditory rhythms: bouncing ball meets metronome.

Michael J Hove1, John R Iversen, Allen Zhang, Bruno H Repp.   

Abstract

Synchronization of finger taps with periodically flashing visual stimuli is known to be much more variable than synchronization with an auditory metronome. When one of these rhythms is the synchronization target and the other serves as a distracter at various temporal offsets, strong auditory dominance is observed. However, it has recently been shown that visuomotor synchronization improves substantially with moving stimuli such as a continuously bouncing ball. The present study pitted a bouncing ball against an auditory metronome in a target-distracter synchronization paradigm, with the participants being auditory experts (musicians) and visual experts (video gamers and ball players). Synchronization was still less variable with auditory than with visual target stimuli in both groups. For musicians, auditory stimuli tended to be more distracting than visual stimuli, whereas the opposite was the case for the visual experts. Overall, there was no main effect of distracter modality. Thus, a distracting spatiotemporal visual rhythm can be as effective as a distracting auditory rhythm in its capacity to perturb synchronous movement, but its effectiveness also depends on modality-specific expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638726     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0441-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Amandine Penel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Audio-visual integration in temporal perception.

Authors:  Yuji Wada; Norimichi Kitagawa; Kaoru Noguchi
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

4.  Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation.

Authors:  M T Elliott; A M Wing; A E Welchman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention.

Authors:  J Vroomen; P Bertelson; B de Gelder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

7.  Response: on catching fly balls.

Authors:  M K McBeath; D M Shaffer; M K Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Combining multisensory temporal information for movement synchronisation.

Authors:  Alan M Wing; Michail Doumas; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses.

Authors:  D H Warren; R B Welch; T J McCarthy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

10.  Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Amandine Penel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-09-03
View more
  33 in total

1.  Tapping ahead of time: its association with timing variability.

Authors:  Junkai Yang; Feiyi Ouyang; Linus Holm; Yingyu Huang; Lingyu Gan; Liang Zhou; Huizhen Chao; Mengye Wang; Mengxue He; Sheng Zhang; Bo Yang; Junhao Pan; Xiang Wu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 2.  Finding the beat: a neural perspective across humans and non-human primates.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Jessica Grahn; Laurel Trainor; Martin Rohrmeier; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on sequence production.

Authors:  J D Kulpa; Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

5.  Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals.

Authors:  John R Iversen; Aniruddh D Patel; Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-11-19

Review 6.  Impaired movement timing in neurological disorders: rehabilitation and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The influence of auditory rhythms on the speed of inferred motion.

Authors:  Timothy B Patrick; Richard B Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  With No Attention Specifically Directed to It, Rhythmic Sound Does Not Automatically Facilitate Visual Task Performance.

Authors:  Jorg De Winne; Paul Devos; Marc Leman; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

9.  Your move or mine? Music training and kinematic compatibility modulate synchronization with self- versus other-generated dance movement.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-29

10.  The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  M C Marieke van der Steen; Peter E Keller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.