OBJECTIVE: We developed a semi-automated method based on a graph-cuts algorithm for segmentation and volumetric measurements of the cartilage from high-resolution knee magnetic resonance (MR) images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database and assessed the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of measurements obtained via this method. DESIGN: MR image sets from 20 subjects of varying Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades (from 0 to IV) on fixed flexion knee radiographs were selected from the baseline double-echo and steady-state (DESS) knee MR images in the OAI database (0.B.1 Imaging Data set). Two trained radiologists independently performed the segmentation of knee cartilage twice using the semi-automated method. The volumes of segmented cartilage were computed and compared. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were determined by means of the coefficient of variation (CV%) of repeated cartilage segmented volume measurements. The subjects were also divided into the low- (0, I or II) and high-KL (III or IV) groups. The differences in cartilage volume measurements and CV% within and between the observers were tested with t tests. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) intra-observer CV% for the 20 cases was 1.29 (+/-1.05)% for observer 1 and 1.67 (+/-1.14)% for observer 2, while the mean (+/-SD) inter-observer CV% was 1.31 (+/-1.26)% for session 1 and 1.79 (+/-1.72)% for session 2. There was no significant difference between the two intra-observer CV%'s (P=0.272) and between the two inter-observer CV%'s (P=0.353). The mean intra-observer CV% of the low-KL group was significantly smaller than that for the high-KL group for observer 1 (0.83 vs 1.86%: P=0.025). The segmentation processing times used by the two observers were significantly different (observer 1 vs 2): (mean 49+/-12 vs 33+/-6min) for session 1 and (49+/-8 vs 32+/-8min) for session 2. CONCLUSION: The semi-automated graph-cuts method allowed us to segment and measure cartilage from high-resolution 3T MR images of the knee with high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in subjects with varying severity of OA.
OBJECTIVE: We developed a semi-automated method based on a graph-cuts algorithm for segmentation and volumetric measurements of the cartilage from high-resolution knee magnetic resonance (MR) images from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database and assessed the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of measurements obtained via this method. DESIGN: MR image sets from 20 subjects of varying Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades (from 0 to IV) on fixed flexion knee radiographs were selected from the baseline double-echo and steady-state (DESS) knee MR images in the OAI database (0.B.1 Imaging Data set). Two trained radiologists independently performed the segmentation of knee cartilage twice using the semi-automated method. The volumes of segmented cartilage were computed and compared. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were determined by means of the coefficient of variation (CV%) of repeated cartilage segmented volume measurements. The subjects were also divided into the low- (0, I or II) and high-KL (III or IV) groups. The differences in cartilage volume measurements and CV% within and between the observers were tested with t tests. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) intra-observer CV% for the 20 cases was 1.29 (+/-1.05)% for observer 1 and 1.67 (+/-1.14)% for observer 2, while the mean (+/-SD) inter-observer CV% was 1.31 (+/-1.26)% for session 1 and 1.79 (+/-1.72)% for session 2. There was no significant difference between the two intra-observer CV%'s (P=0.272) and between the two inter-observer CV%'s (P=0.353). The mean intra-observer CV% of the low-KL group was significantly smaller than that for the high-KL group for observer 1 (0.83 vs 1.86%: P=0.025). The segmentation processing times used by the two observers were significantly different (observer 1 vs 2): (mean 49+/-12 vs 33+/-6min) for session 1 and (49+/-8 vs 32+/-8min) for session 2. CONCLUSION: The semi-automated graph-cuts method allowed us to segment and measure cartilage from high-resolution 3T MR images of the knee with high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in subjects with varying severity of OA.
Authors: F Eckstein; A Gavazzeni; H Sittek; M Haubner; A Lösch; S Milz; K H Englmeier; E Schulte; R Putz; M Reiser Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Claude Kauffmann; Pierre Gravel; Benoît Godbout; Alain Gravel; Gilles Beaudoin; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Jacques A de Guise Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: C G Peterfy; C F van Dijke; D L Janzen; C C Glüer; R Namba; S Majumdar; P Lang; H K Genant Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Chao Huang; Liang Shan; H Cecil Charles; Wolfgang Wirth; Marc Niethammer; Hongtu Zhu Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: W Wirth; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; O Benichou; D Dreher; R Y Davies; J Lee; K Picha; A Gimona; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: N A Smith; J Achten; N Parsons; D Wright; B Parkinson; P Thompson; C E Hutchinson; T Spalding; M L Costa Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.853