A A Kshirsagar1, P J Watson, J A Tyler, L D Hall. 1. Herchel Smith Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, Cambridge University School of Clinical Medicine, University Forvie Site, UK.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This work demonstrates a new method for computerized measurement of the dimensions (thickness and volume) of articular cartilage for any specified region of the human knee joint. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) images optimized for cartilage contrast have been analyzed using computerized edge-detection techniques, and the reproducibility of articular cartilage thickness and volume measurements is assessed. METHODS: A fat-suppressed, three-dimensional SPoiled GRass MR sequence (45/7.5/30 degrees) with total scan time of approximately 12 minutes was used to acquire volume images of human knee joints at spatial resolution of 0.6 x 1.2 x 1.2 mm. Measurements were made using six repeated scans for three healthy volunteers over a period of 2 months. The subsequent semi-automated image processing to establish total cartilage volume and cartilage thickness maps for the femur required approximately 60 minutes of operator time. RESULTS: The mean coefficient of variation for total cartilage volume for the six repeated scans for the three volunteers was 3.8%, and the average coefficient of variation for the user-selected cartilage plugs was 2.0%. The cartilage thickness maps from the repeated scans of the same knee were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Standard resolution MR images with fat-suppressed contrast lead to an objective and reproducible measurement of spatial dimensions of articular cartilage when analyzed semi-automatically using computerized edge-detection methods.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This work demonstrates a new method for computerized measurement of the dimensions (thickness and volume) of articular cartilage for any specified region of the human knee joint. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) images optimized for cartilage contrast have been analyzed using computerized edge-detection techniques, and the reproducibility of articular cartilage thickness and volume measurements is assessed. METHODS: A fat-suppressed, three-dimensional SPoiled GRass MR sequence (45/7.5/30 degrees) with total scan time of approximately 12 minutes was used to acquire volume images of human knee joints at spatial resolution of 0.6 x 1.2 x 1.2 mm. Measurements were made using six repeated scans for three healthy volunteers over a period of 2 months. The subsequent semi-automated image processing to establish total cartilage volume and cartilage thickness maps for the femur required approximately 60 minutes of operator time. RESULTS: The mean coefficient of variation for total cartilage volume for the six repeated scans for the three volunteers was 3.8%, and the average coefficient of variation for the user-selected cartilage plugs was 2.0%. The cartilage thickness maps from the repeated scans of the same knee were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Standard resolution MR images with fat-suppressed contrast lead to an objective and reproducible measurement of spatial dimensions of articular cartilage when analyzed semi-automatically using computerized edge-detection methods.
Authors: M H Brem; J Pauser; H Yoshioka; A Brenning; J Stratmann; F F Hennig; R Kikinis; J Duryea; C S Winalski; P Lang Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Markus T Berninger; Pablo Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Franz Schilling; Bernhard Haller; Thorsten Lichtenstein; Andreas B Imhoff; Ernst J Rummeny; Martina Anton; Stephan Vogt; Tobias D Henning Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: J Duryea; G Neumann; M H Brem; W Koh; F Noorbakhsh; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; P Lang Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Leo Passov; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Huanzhou Hu; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 8.545