Literature DB >> 10463654

Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation.

T Stammberger1, F Eckstein, M Michaelis, K H Englmeier, M Reiser.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to develop a segmentation technique for thickness measurements of the articular cartilage in MR images and to assess the interobserver reproducibility of the method in comparison with manual segmentation. The algorithm is based on a B-spline snakes approach and is able to delineate the cartilage boundaries in real time and with minimal user interaction. The interobserver reproducibility of the method, ranging from 3.3 to 13.6% for various section orientations and joint surfaces, proved to be significantly superior to manual segmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10463654     DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00040-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  31 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of volume measurement of knee cartilage segmented from the OAI MR image set using a novel semi-automated segmentation method.

Authors:  K T Bae; H Shim; C Tao; S Chang; J H Wang; R Boudreau; C K Kwoh
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Quantitative MRI of articular cartilage and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  M H Brem; J Pauser; H Yoshioka; A Brenning; J Stratmann; F F Hennig; R Kikinis; J Duryea; C S Winalski; P Lang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Neal K Bangerter; Lance S McGavin; Christopher L Peters; Alex J Drew; Christopher J Hanrahan; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The effect of a six-month training program followed by a marathon run on knee joint cartilage volume and thickness in marathon beginners.

Authors:  Stefan Hinterwimmer; Matthias J Feucht; Corinna Steinbrech; Heiko Graichen; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Knee cartilage MRI with in situ mechanical loading using prospective motion correction.

Authors:  Thomas Lange; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Cris Lovell-Smith; Kaywan Izadpanah; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Correlation and sex differences between ankle and knee cartilage morphology determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; V Siedek; C Glaser; D Al-Ali; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; H Graichen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.