OBJECTIVE: Quantitative knee cartilage T2 assessment on limited two-dimensional midsagittal or midcoronal planes may be insufficient to assess variations in normal cartilage composition. The purpose of this work was to reveal characteristic 3D distribution of T2 values in femoral cartilage in healthy volunteer knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen volunteers were enrolled in this study. One knee joint in each volunteer was imaged using a 3D fast image employing steady-state acquisition cycled phases (FIESTA-C) sequence for modeling distal femoral morphology, as well as a sagittal T2 mapping of cartilage. 3D distribution of cartilage T2 values was generated for the femoral condyles. At each medial and lateral condyle, four regions of interest (ROI) were manually defined based on the cartilage covered by the 3D surface model of the medial and lateral menisci. RESULTS: The 3D maps showed a relatively inhomogeneous distribution of cartilage T2 on the medial and lateral condyles. Cartilage T2 values in the internal half of the weight-bearing zone were significantly higher than those in all other zones on both lateral and medial condyles. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of 3D distribution of femoral cartilage T2 may be valuable in determining the site-specific normal range of cartilage T2 in the healthy knee joint.
OBJECTIVE: Quantitative knee cartilage T2 assessment on limited two-dimensional midsagittal or midcoronal planes may be insufficient to assess variations in normal cartilage composition. The purpose of this work was to reveal characteristic 3D distribution of T2 values in femoral cartilage in healthy volunteer knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen volunteers were enrolled in this study. One knee joint in each volunteer was imaged using a 3D fast image employing steady-state acquisition cycled phases (FIESTA-C) sequence for modeling distal femoral morphology, as well as a sagittal T2 mapping of cartilage. 3D distribution of cartilage T2 values was generated for the femoral condyles. At each medial and lateral condyle, four regions of interest (ROI) were manually defined based on the cartilage covered by the 3D surface model of the medial and lateral menisci. RESULTS: The 3D maps showed a relatively inhomogeneous distribution of cartilage T2 on the medial and lateral condyles. Cartilage T2 values in the internal half of the weight-bearing zone were significantly higher than those in all other zones on both lateral and medial condyles. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of 3D distribution of femoral cartilage T2 may be valuable in determining the site-specific normal range of cartilage T2 in the healthy knee joint.
Authors: M T Nieminen; J Töyräs; J Rieppo; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: James R Slauterbeck; Petteri Kousa; Blake C Clifton; Shelly Naud; Timothy W Tourville; Robert J Johnson; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marius E Mayerhoefer; Goetz H Welsch; Tallal C Mamisch; Franz Kainberger; Michael Weber; Stefan Nemec; Klaus M Friedrich; Albert Dirisamer; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jan Hohe; Sonja Faber; Roland Muehlbauer; Maximilian Reiser; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Felix Eckstein Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 2.242