Literature DB >> 19576237

Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception.

N Rankin Williams1, Verena Willenbockel, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

Prior work using a matching task between images that were complementary in spatial frequency and orientation information suggested that the representation of faces, but not objects, retains low-level spatial frequency (SF) information [Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biological Sciences, 352, 1203-1219]. In two experiments, we reexamine the claim that face perception is uniquely sensitive to changes in SF. In contrast to prior work, we used a design allowing the computation of sensitivity and response criterion for each category, and in one experiment, equalized low-level image properties across object categories. In both experiments, we find that observers are sensitive to SF and orientation changes for upright and inverted faces and non-face objects. Differential response biases across categories contributed to a larger sensitivity for faces, but even sensitivity showed a larger effect for faces, especially when faces were upright and in a front-facing view. However, when objects were inverted, or upright but shown in a three-quarter view, the matching of objects and faces was equally sensitive to SF changes. Accordingly, face perception does not appear to be uniquely affected by changes in spatial filter components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19576237      PMCID: PMC2886984          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  30 in total

1.  The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level.

Authors:  I Gauthier; M J Tarr; J Moylan; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition.

Authors:  C H Liu; C A Collin; S J Rainville; A Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Size tuning in the absence of spatial frequency tuning in object recognition.

Authors:  J Fiser; S Subramaniam; I Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing.

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux; Isabel Gauthier; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

6.  Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?

Authors:  Rachel Robbins; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-05

7.  A decisional component of holistic encoding.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; Erin M Ingvalson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Nicholas Knouf; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-11       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.

Authors:  Charles A Collin; Chang Hong Liu; Nikolaus F Troje; Patricia A McMullen; Avi Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Expertise Effects in Face-Selective Areas are Robust to Clutter and Diverted Attention, but not to Competition.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Ana E Van Gulick; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Perceptual expertise with objects predicts another hallmark of face perception.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity.

Authors:  Cindy M Bukach; W Stewart Phillips; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  From coarse to fine? Spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical face processing.

Authors:  Valerie Goffaux; Judith Peters; Julie Haubrechts; Christine Schiltz; Bernadette Jansma; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing.

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-28

7.  A face detection bias for horizontal orientations develops in middle childhood.

Authors:  Benjamin J Balas; Jamie Schmidt; Alyson Saville
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.