Literature DB >> 12219796

A decisional component of holistic encoding.

Michael J Wenger1, Erin M Ingvalson.   

Abstract

It has been proposed (see, specifically, M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, & J. N. Tanaka, 1998) that human faces are used in cognition as undifferentiated wholes. General recognition theory (GRT; F. G. Ashby & J. T. Townsend, 1986) is used to represent hypotheses regarding the possible sources for the behavioral evidence supporting holistic representation. Specifically, it is suggested that holism can be understood in terms of violations of informational independence, informational separability, or decisional separability, as these constructs are defined in GRT. Stimuli were presented upright, inverted, and in an encoding task that emphasized the meaningful nature of the stimuli. Patterns of performance (recognition hit rates) were consistent with prior studies. However, there were only a handful of violations of informational separability. Instead, consistent violations of decisional separability suggested a decisional basis for holistic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  34 in total

1.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience.

Authors:  Guomei Zhou; Zhijie Cheng; Xudong Zhang; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Remembering first impressions: effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory.

Authors:  Roee Gilron; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Internal curvature signal and noise in low- and high-level vision.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Marcia Grabowecky; Yee Joon Kim; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

5.  Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Yu Xi Peh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Indecision on decisional separability.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

7.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

9.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.