Literature DB >> 10884004

The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition.

C H Liu1, C A Collin, S J Rainville, A Chaudhuri.   

Abstract

The effects of spatial frequency overlap between pairs of low-pass versus high-pass images on face recognition and matching were examined in 6 experiments. Overlap was defined as the range of spatial frequencies shared by a pair of filtered images. This factor was manipulated by processing image pairs with high-pass/low-pass filter pairs whose 50% cutoff points varied in their separation from one another. The effects of the center frequency of filter pairs were also investigated. In general, performance improved with greater overlap and higher center frequency. In control conditions, the image pairs were processed with identical filters and thus had complete overlap. Even severely filtered low-pass or high-pass images in these conditions produced superior performance. These results suggest that face recognition is more strongly affected by spatial frequency overlap than by the frequency content of the images.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884004     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

3.  Perceptual expertise with objects predicts another hallmark of face perception.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Coarse-to-fine encoding of spatial frequency information into visual short-term memory for faces but impartial decay.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Abnormalities of visual processing and frontostriatal systems in body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Jamie D Feusner; Teena Moody; Emily Hembacher; Jennifer Townsend; Malin McKinley; Hayley Moller; Susan Bookheimer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02

6.  Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception.

Authors:  N Rankin Williams; Verena Willenbockel; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  FIAEs in Famous Faces are Mediated by Type of Processing.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01

8.  From coarse to fine? Spatial and temporal dynamics of cortical face processing.

Authors:  Valerie Goffaux; Judith Peters; Julie Haubrechts; Christine Schiltz; Bernadette Jansma; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  The Language, Tone and Prosody of Emotions: Neural Substrates and Dynamics of Spoken-Word Emotion Perception.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; David A Silbersweig; Emily Stern
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.