Literature DB >> 12711154

Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?

Rachel Robbins1, Elinor McKone.   

Abstract

The origin of "special" processing for upright faces has been a matter of ongoing debate. If it is due to generic expertise, as opposed to having some innate component, holistic processing should be learnable for stimuli other than upright faces. Here we assess inverted faces. We trained subjects to discriminate identical twins using up to 1100 exposures to each twin in different poses and images. In the upright orientation, twin discrimination was supported by holistic processing. Removal of a single face feature had no effect on performance, and a composite effect (Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D.C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception 16 (6), 747-759) was obtained. In the inverted orientation, however, above chance identification ability relied on (a) image specific learning, or (b) tiny local feature differences not noticed in the upright faces. The failure to learn holistic processing for inverted faces indicates that, in contrast to the situation for objects (Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology 21 (2), 233-282), orientation specificity of face processing is highly stable against practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711154     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  18 in total

Review 1.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Louie; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability.

Authors:  Christopher D'Lauro; James W Tanaka; Tim Curran
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

Review 4.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

5.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception.

Authors:  N Rankin Williams; Verena Willenbockel; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Seeing the mean: ensemble coding for sets of faces.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; David Whitney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Learning to recognize face shapes through serial exploration.

Authors:  Christian Wallraven; Lisa Whittingstall; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural representations that support invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  The evolution of holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Danielle Sulikowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.