Literature DB >> 20952784

Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity.

Cindy M Bukach1, W Stewart Phillips, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

Both domain-specific and expertise accounts of category specialization assume that generalization occurs within a domain but not between domains. Yet it is often difficult to define the boundaries and critical features of object domains. Differences in how categories are defined make it difficult to adjudicate between accounts of category specificity and may lead to contradictory results. For example, evidence for whether car experts recruit the fusiform face area is mixed, and this inconsistency may be due to the inclusion of antique cars in one of those previous studies (e.g., Grill-Spector, Knouf, & Kanwisher, 2004). The present study tested the generalization of expertise from modern to antique cars and found that modern-car experts showed expert discrimination and holistic processing of modern cars but not of antique cars. These findings suggest that the neural specialization underlying perceptual expertise is highly specific and may not generalize to distinct subclasses, even when they share some degree of perceptual and conceptual features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952784      PMCID: PMC2957663          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  58 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Domain specificity in face perception.

Authors:  N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  "We all look the same to me": positive emotions eliminate the own-race in face recognition.

Authors:  Kareem J Johnson; Barbara L Fredrickson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-11

5.  The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Jia Liu; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  I Gauthier; A W Anderson; M J Tarr; P Skudlarski; J C Gore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Plasticity of face processing in infancy.

Authors:  O Pascalis; L S Scott; D J Kelly; R W Shannon; E Nicholson; M Coleman; C A Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Graham Byatt; Patricia T Michie; Aina Puce
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  41 in total

1.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience.

Authors:  Guomei Zhou; Zhijie Cheng; Xudong Zhang; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Visual prediction and perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Olivia S Cheung; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Differential item functioning analysis of the Vanderbilt Expertise Test for cars.

Authors:  Woo-Yeol Lee; Sun-Joo Cho; Rankin W McGugin; Ana Beth Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The style of a stranger: Identification expertise generalizes to coarser level categories.

Authors:  Rachel A Searston; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  High-resolution imaging of expertise reveals reliable object selectivity in the fusiform face area related to perceptual performance.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; J Christopher Gatenby; John C Gore; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The Role of Search Speed in the Contextual Cueing of Children's Attention.

Authors:  Kevin Darby; Joseph Burling; Hanako Yoshida
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2014-01

9.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Kelsi F Rugo; Kendall N Tamler; Geoffrey F Woodman; Ashleigh M Maxcey
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.