Ally Ha1, Carly Richards1, Erik Criman1, Jillian Piaggione1, Christopher Yheulon1, Robert Lim2. 1. Departments of General Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Honolulu, HI, 96819, USA. 2. Departments of General Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Honolulu, HI, 96819, USA. Rob_Lim@Hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical energy injuries are an underappreciated phenomenon. Improper use of surgical energy or poor attention to patient safety can result in operating room fires, tissue injuries, and interferences with other electronic devices, while rare complications can be devastatingly severe. Despite this, there is no current standard requirement for educating surgeons on the safe use of energy-based devices or evaluation of electrosurgery (ES) education in residency training, credentialing, or practice. The study aimed to assess the current baseline knowledge of surgeons and surgical trainees with regards to ES across varying experiences at a tertiary level care center. METHODS: Surgeons and surgical trainees from seven surgical specialties (General Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, and Otorhinolaryngology) at a tertiary level care hospital were tested. Testing included an evaluation regarding their background training and experiences with ES-related adverse events and a 15 multiple-choice-question exam testing critical knowledge of ES. RESULTS: A total of 134 surveys were sent out with 72 responses (53.7%). The mean quiz score was 51.5 ± 15.5% (passing score was 80%). Of staff surgeons, 33/65 (50.8%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 54.9 and 53.3%, respectively (range 33.3-86.7%). Of surgical trainees, 39/69 (56.5%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 48.6 and 46.7%, respectively (range 13.3-80.0%). There were no statistically significant differences based on training status (p = 0.08), previous training (p = 0.24), number of cases (p = 0.06), or specialty (p = 0.689). CONCLUSION: Surgeons and surgical trainees both have a significant knowledge gap in the safe and effective use of surgical energy devices, regardless of surgical specialty and despite what they feel was adequate training. The knowledge gap is not improved with experience. A formal surgical energy education program should be a requirement for residency training or credentialing.
BACKGROUND: Surgical energy injuries are an underappreciated phenomenon. Improper use of surgical energy or poor attention to patient safety can result in operating room fires, tissue injuries, and interferences with other electronic devices, while rare complications can be devastatingly severe. Despite this, there is no current standard requirement for educating surgeons on the safe use of energy-based devices or evaluation of electrosurgery (ES) education in residency training, credentialing, or practice. The study aimed to assess the current baseline knowledge of surgeons and surgical trainees with regards to ES across varying experiences at a tertiary level care center. METHODS: Surgeons and surgical trainees from seven surgical specialties (General Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, and Otorhinolaryngology) at a tertiary level care hospital were tested. Testing included an evaluation regarding their background training and experiences with ES-related adverse events and a 15 multiple-choice-question exam testing critical knowledge of ES. RESULTS: A total of 134 surveys were sent out with 72 responses (53.7%). The mean quiz score was 51.5 ± 15.5% (passing score was 80%). Of staff surgeons, 33/65 (50.8%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 54.9 and 53.3%, respectively (range 33.3-86.7%). Of surgical trainees, 39/69 (56.5%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 48.6 and 46.7%, respectively (range 13.3-80.0%). There were no statistically significant differences based on training status (p = 0.08), previous training (p = 0.24), number of cases (p = 0.06), or specialty (p = 0.689). CONCLUSION: Surgeons and surgical trainees both have a significant knowledge gap in the safe and effective use of surgical energy devices, regardless of surgical specialty and despite what they feel was adequate training. The knowledge gap is not improved with experience. A formal surgical energy education program should be a requirement for residency training or credentialing.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electrosurgery; Energy devices; FUSE; OR fires; Surgical energy
Authors: Henry R Govekar; Thomas N Robinson; Paul D Varosy; Guillaume Girard; Paul N Montero; Christina L Dunn; Edward L Jones; Greg V Stiegmann Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Zorana Mayooran; Scott Pearce; Jim Tsaltas; Luk Rombauts; T Ian H Brown; Anthony S Lawrence; Kym Fraser; David L Healy Journal: BJOG Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Paul D Varosy; Girard Guillaume; James E Dunning; Nicole T Townsend; Edward L Jones; Alessandro Paniccia; Greg V Stiegmann; Christopher Weyer; Marc A Rozner Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Amin Madani; Yusuke Watanabe; Melina C Vassiliou; Pascal Fuchshuber; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Rajeswara R Resapu; Daniel B Jones; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 4.584