Literature DB >> 1955817

Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.

S L Cohen1, M N Branch.   

Abstract

Seven pigeons were studied in two experiments in which key pecks were reinforced under a second-order schedule wherein satisfaction of variable-interval schedule requirements produced food or a brief stimulus. In the second part of each session, responses produced only the brief stimulus according to a variable-interval schedule (food extinction). For the 4 pigeons in Experiment 1, the response key was red throughout the session. In separate phases, the brief stimulus was either paired with food, not paired with food, or not presented during extinction. d-Amphetamine (0.3 to 10.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently reduced food-maintained responding during the first part of the session and, at intermediate dosages, increased responding during the extinction portion of the session. The magnitude of these increases, however, did not consistently depend on whether the brief stimulus was paired, not paired, or not presented. It was also true that under nondrug conditions, response rates during extinction did not differ reliably depending on pairing operations for the brief stimulus. In Experiment 2, 3 different pigeons responded under a procedure wherein the key was red in the component with food presentations and blue in the extinction component (i.e., multiple schedule). Again, d-amphetamine produced dose-related decreases in responding during the first part of a session and increases in responding in the second part of the session. These increases, however, were related to the pairing operations; larger increases were observed when the brief stimulus was paired with food than when it was not or when it was not presented at all. Under nondrug conditions, the paired brief stimulus controlled higher response rates during extinction than did a nonpaired stimulus or no stimulus. These findings suggest that d-amphetamine can enhance the efficacy of conditioned reinforcers, and that this effect may be more robust if conditioned reinforcers occur in the context of a signaled period of extinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955817      PMCID: PMC1323102          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Factors influencing responding under multiple schedules of conditioned and unconditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  S L Cohen; B E Lentz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Second-order schedules: comparison of different procedures for scheduling paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  The effects of methadone on operant behavior maintained with and without conditioned reinforcement in the pigeon.

Authors:  T H Kelly; T Thompson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Beninger; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of d-amphetamine on the behavior of pigeons maintained by a second-order schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  N W Bond; D J Sanger; D E Blackman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effects of methylphenidate on responding under extinction in the presence and absence of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  F.J. Files; M.N. Branch; D. Clody
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol.

Authors:  R J Beninger; D R Hanson; A G Phillips
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The behavioral pharmacology of anorexigenic drugs in nonhuman primates: 30 years of progress.

Authors:  Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Effects of cocaine on briefly signaled versus completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D J Walker; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of d-amphetamine on responding under second-order schedules of reinforcement with paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.

Authors:  S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Synergistic interaction between caloric restriction and amphetamine in food-unrelated approach behavior of rats.

Authors:  Kristine L Keller; Fiori R Vollrath-Smith; Mehrnoosh Jafari; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Neurocircuitry of drug reward.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Bromocriptine enhancement of responding for conditioned reward depends on intact D1 receptor function.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists attenuate amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats.

Authors:  R Ranaldi; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.