Literature DB >> 24101157

Synergistic interaction between caloric restriction and amphetamine in food-unrelated approach behavior of rats.

Kristine L Keller1, Fiori R Vollrath-Smith, Mehrnoosh Jafari, Satoshi Ikemoto.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Approach behavior is regulated by the brain integrating information about environment and body state. Psychoactive drugs interact with this process.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the extent to which caloric (i.e., food) restriction, amphetamine (AMPH) and lithium interact in potentiating locomotor activity and responding reinforced by visual stimulus (VS), a reward unrelated to energy homeostasis.
METHODS: Rats either had ad libitum access to food or received daily rations that maintained 85-90 % of their original body weights. Leverpressing turned on a cue light for 1 s and turned off house light for 5 s. AMPH and lithium were administered through intraperitoneal injections and diet, respectively.
RESULTS: Food restriction or AMPH (1 mg/kg) alone had little effect on VS-reinforced responding; however, the combination of the two conditions markedly potentiated VS-reinforced responding (fourfold). Food restriction lasting 7 days or longer was needed to augment AMPH's effect on VS-reinforced responding. AMPH (0.3-3 mg/kg) potentiated locomotor activity similarly between food-restricted and ad libitum groups. Repeated injections of AMPH-sensitized locomotor activity, but not VS-reinforced responding. In addition, while chronic lithium treatments (0.2 % lithium carbonate chow) reduced VS-reinforced responding, chronic lithium further augmented AMPH-potentiated VS-reinforced responding.
CONCLUSIONS: Food restriction interacts with psychoactive drugs to potentiate goal-directed responding unrelated to food seeking in a much more powerful manner than previously thought. The novel finding that lithium can augment a psychostimulant effect of AMPH suggests caution when combining lithium and psychostimulant drugs in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24101157      PMCID: PMC3945411          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3300-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  73 in total

1.  A progressive ratio schedule of self-stimulation testing in rats reveals profound augmentation of d-amphetamine reward by food restriction but no effect of a "sensitizing" regimen of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  Soledad Cabeza de Vaca; Lisa L Krahne; Kenneth D Carr
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine.

Authors:  T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Lithium: the present and the future.

Authors:  J W Jefferson
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation.

Authors:  T W Robbins; G F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 5.  Prolonged fasting as a method of mood enhancement in chronic pain syndromes: a review of clinical evidence and mechanisms.

Authors:  Andreas Michalsen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-04

6.  Effects of D-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat.

Authors:  F C Clark; B J Steele
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

7.  Chronic food restriction and weight loss produce opioid facilitation of perifornical hypothalamic self-stimulation.

Authors:  K D Carr; T D Wolinsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-04-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Effects of chronic lithium treatment on dopamine receptors in the rat corpus striatum. I. Locomotor activity and behavioral supersensitivity.

Authors:  D A Staunton; P J Magistretti; W J Shoemaker; F E Bloom
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-01-28       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Differential contribution of mesoaccumbens and mesohabenular dopamine to intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  Vincent Duchesne; Sandra M Boye
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  A neural computational model of incentive salience.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Kent C Berridge; Amy J Tindell; Kyle S Smith; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  9 in total

1.  Responding for a conditioned reinforcer or unconditioned sensory reinforcer in mice: interactions with environmental enrichment, social isolation, and monoamine reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  Caleb J Browne; Paul J Fletcher; Fiona D Zeeb
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effect of yohimbine on reinstatement of operant responding in rats is dependent on cue contingency but not food reward history.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Chen; Kimberly A Fiscella; Samuel Z Bacharach; Gianluigi Tanda; Yavin Shaham; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Interaction of chronic food restriction and methylphenidate in sensation seeking of rats.

Authors:  Aleksandr D Talishinsky; Celine Nicolas; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Similar roles of substantia nigra and ventral tegmental dopamine neurons in reward and aversion.

Authors:  Anton Ilango; Andrew J Kesner; Kristine L Keller; Garret D Stuber; Antonello Bonci; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by D-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wright; Suelynn Ren; Annie Constantin; Paul B S Clarke
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Supramammillary neurons projecting to the septum regulate dopamine and motivation for environmental interaction in mice.

Authors:  Andrew J Kesner; Rick Shin; Coleman B Calva; Reuben F Don; Sue Junn; Christian T Potter; Leslie A Ramsey; Ahmed F Abou-Elnaga; Christopher G Cover; Dong V Wang; Hanbing Lu; Yihong Yang; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Genome-scale metabolic model of the rat liver predicts effects of diet restriction.

Authors:  Priyanka Baloni; Vineet Sangar; James T Yurkovich; Max Robinson; Scott Taylor; Christine M Karbowski; Hisham K Hamadeh; Yudong D He; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Seeking motivation and reward: Roles of dopamine, hippocampus, and supramammillo-septal pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Kesner; Coleman B Calva; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Phasic excitation of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons potentiates the initiation of conditioned approach behavior: parametric and reinforcement-schedule analyses.

Authors:  Anton Ilango; Andrew J Kesner; Carl J Broker; Dong V Wang; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.