Literature DB >> 9934288

Learning objectives for medical student education--guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project.

.   

Abstract

Many observers of medicine have expressed concerns that new doctors are not as well prepared as they should be to meet society's expectations of them. To assist medical schools in their efforts to respond to these concerns, in January 1996 the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) established the Medical School Objectives Project (MSOP). The goal for the first phase of the project--which has been completed and is reported in this article--was to develop a consensus within the medical education community on the attributes that medical students should possess at the time of graduation, and to set forth learning objectives that can guide each medical school as it establishes objectives for its own program. Later reports will focus on the implementation phase of the MSOP. In this report, each of the four attributes agreed upon by a wide spectrum of medical educators is stated and explained, and then the learning objectives associated with the school's instilling of that attribute are stated. The first of the four attributes is that physicians must be altruistic. There are seven learning objectives, including the objective that before graduation, the student can demonstrate compassionate treatment of patients and respect for their privacy and dignity. The second attribute is that physicians must be knowledgeable; one of the six learning objectives is that the student can demonstrate knowledge of the normal structure and function of the body and of each of its major organ systems. The third attribute is that physicians must be skillful; one of the eleven learning objectives is that the student have knowledge about relieving pain and ameliorating the suffering of patients. The last attribute is that physicians must be dutiful; one of the six learning objectives is that the student have knowledge of the epidemiology of common maladies within a defined population, and the systematic approaches useful in reducing the incidence and prevalence of those maladies. The report ends by stating that (1) if a school's curriculum is shaped by the set of learning objectives presented in the report, the graduates will be well prepared to assume the limited patient care responsibilities expected of new residents and also will have begun to achieve the attributes needed to practice contemporary medicine; (2) schools should feel a sense of urgency in responding to the intent of the report; and (3) it is important to measure the outcomes of learning objectives, and better assessment methods should be developed, particularly ones to assess outcomes related to attitudes and values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9934288     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199901000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  122 in total

1.  Medical education curricula. Where's the beef?

Authors:  P Thomas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trend spotting: fashions in medical education.

Authors:  J K Campbell; C Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

3.  Early introduction of an evidence-based medicine course to preclinical medical students.

Authors:  Malathi Srinivasan; Michael Weiner; Philip P Breitfeld; Fran Brahmi; Keith L Dickerson; Gary Weiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  New measures for new roles: defining and measuring the current practices of health sciences librarians.

Authors:  Carol S Scherrer; Susan Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-04

5.  Developing an "evidence-based medicine and use of the biomedical literature" component as a longitudinal theme of an outcomes-based medical school curriculum: year 1.

Authors:  Suzetta Burrows; Kelly Moore; Joaquin Arriaga; Gediminas Paulaitis; Henry L Lemkau
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-01

Review 6.  Fostering professionalism in medical education: a call for improved assessment and meaningful incentives.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Virginia A Reed; G Christian Jernstedt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Internet resources for curriculum development in medical education: an annotated bibliography.

Authors:  Patricia A Thomas; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Education in pharmacoeconomics: an international multidisciplinary view.

Authors:  Karen L Rascati; Michael F Drummond; Lieven Annemans; Peter G Davey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Healthcare professional students' knowledge of drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Amanda R Harrington; Terri L Warholak; Lisa E Hines; Ann M Taylor; Duane Sherrill; Daniel C Malone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Appraising and applying evidence about a diagnostic test during a performance-based assessment.

Authors:  George Bergus; Scott Vogelgesang; Janeta Tansey; Ellen Franklin; Ronald Feld
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.