Literature DB >> 19544765

Pediatric organ dose measurements in axial and helical multislice CT.

Alanna McDermott1, R Allen White, Mike Mc-Nitt-Gray, Erin Angel, Dianna Cody.   

Abstract

An anthropomorphic pediatric phantom (5-yr-old equivalent) was used to determine organ doses at specific surface and internal locations resulting from computed tomography (CT) scans. This phantom contains four different tissue-equivalent materials: Soft tissue, bone, brain, and lung. It was imaged on a 64-channel CT scanner with three head protocols (one contiguous axial scan and two helical scans [pitch = 0.516 and 0.984]) and four chest protocols (one contiguous axial scan and three helical scans [pitch = 0.516, 0.984, and 1.375]). Effective mA s [= (tube current x rotation time)/pitch] was kept nearly constant at 200 effective mA s for head and 290 effective mA s for chest protocols. Dose measurements were acquired using thermoluminescent dosimeter powder in capsules placed at locations internal to the phantom and on the phantom surface. The organs of interest were the brain, both eyes, thyroid, sternum, both breasts, and both lungs. The organ dose measurements from helical scans were lower than for contiguous axial scans by 0% to 25% even after adjusting for equivalent effective mA s. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in organ dose values between the 0.516 and 0.984 pitch values for both head and chest scans. The chest organ dose measurements obtained at a pitch of 1.375 were significantly higher than the dose values obtained at the other helical pitches used for chest scans (p < 0.05). This difference was attributed to the automatic selection of the large focal spot due to a higher tube current value. These findings suggest that there may be a previously unsuspected radiation dose benefit associated with the use of helical scan mode during computed tomography scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544765      PMCID: PMC2736703          DOI: 10.1118/1.3101817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

2.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; J O'Daniel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Assessment of dose and risk to the body following conventional and spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  L L Chang; F D Chen; P S Chang; C C Liu; H L Lien
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1995-04

6.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the pelvis: comparison of helical and axial scanning.

Authors:  A G Pitman; R S Budd; A F McKenzie
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1997-11

7.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

Authors:  F A Mettler; P W Wiest; J A Locken; C A Kelsey
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  Whole-body voxel phantoms of paediatric patients--UF Series B.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Choonsik Lee; Jonathan L Williams; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Jonathan L Williams; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Lane F Donnelly; Nancy S Rosen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  3 in total

1.  Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom.

Authors:  Hugo de las Heras; Ronaldo Minniti; Sean Wilson; Chad Mitchell; Marlene Skopec; Claudia C Brunner; Kish Chakrabarti
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors.

Authors:  Kazuki Takegami; Hiroaki Hayashi; Kenji Yamada; Yoshiki Mihara; Natsumi Kimoto; Yuki Kanazawa; Kousaku Higashino; Kazuta Yamashita; Fumio Hayashi; Tohru Okazaki; Takuya Hashizume; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-24

3.  Bismuth Pelvic X-Ray Shielding Reduces Radiation Dose Exposure in Pediatric Radiography.

Authors:  Bow Wang; Chien-Yi Ting; Cheng-Shih Lai; Yi-Shan Tsai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.