Literature DB >> 11140709

CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

F A Mettler1, P W Wiest, J A Locken, C A Kelsey.   

Abstract

CT scanning is a relatively high-dose procedure. In spite of the use of magnetic resonance imaging, with faster CT scanners and helical techniques CT is becoming more common. There are few data from practice in the United States regarding the age and sex distribution of patients receiving CT scans, what type of scan and how many scans they receive, or how much radiation dose CT scans contribute. We reviewed over 33,700 consecutive CT examinations done at our institution in 1998 and 1999. Information on the types of scans as well as the age and sex distribution of the patients was determined. Between 1990 and 1999, CT examinations in our institution increased from 6.1% to 11.1% of all radiology procedures. Nineteen per cent of all patients seen in our department in the last year had at least one CT scan and more than half had multiple scans on the same day. Thirty-six per cent of all patients had a prior CT examination done on an earlier date. The male/female ratio of patients was 56/44. Studies of children age 0-15 years comprised 11.2% of scans. The highest percentage of scans was done in the 36-50-year-old age group. CT scanning accounted for 67% of the effective dose from diagnostic radiology. In most large hospitals in the United States CT scanning probably accounts for more than 10% of diagnostic radiology examinations and about two-thirds of the radiation dose. Most patients have multiple scan sequences. Studies done on children are probably more common than previously thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11140709     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  136 in total

1.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

2.  Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Imanishi; Atsushi Fukui; Hiroshi Niimi; Daisuke Itoh; Kyouko Nozaki; Shunsuke Nakaji; Kumiko Ishizuka; Hitoshi Tabata; Yu Furuya; Masahiko Uzura; Hideto Takahama; Suzuo Hashizume; Shiro Arima; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Multislice CT: update on radiation and screening.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection.

Authors:  A Korn; M Fenchel; B Bender; S Danz; T K Hauser; D Ketelsen; T Flohr; C D Claussen; M Heuschmid; U Ernemann; H Brodoefel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Clinical demand for chest/abdomen/pelvis anatomy following thoracic or lumbar spine CT.

Authors:  Tiffany M Newman; Matthew D Cham; Honglei Zhang; Keith D Hentel; Kevin Mennitt; Linda Heier; Martin R Prince
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 6.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  An analytical model of the effects of pulse pileup on the energy spectrum recorded by energy resolved photon counting x-ray detectors.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Taguchi; Eric C Frey; Xiaolan Wang; Jan S Iwanczyk; William C Barber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Schöneberg; B Schweiger; B Hussmann; M D Kauther; S Lendemans; C Waydhas
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.