Literature DB >> 27341805

Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors.

Kazuki Takegami1,2, Hiroaki Hayashi3, Kenji Yamada4, Yoshiki Mihara5, Natsumi Kimoto1, Yuki Kanazawa6, Kousaku Higashino6,4, Kazuta Yamashita6,4, Fumio Hayashi6,4, Tohru Okazaki7, Takuya Hashizume7, Ikuo Kobayashi7.   

Abstract

Entrance surface dose (ESD) measurements are important in X-ray computed tomography (CT) for examination, but in clinical settings it is difficult to measure ESDs because of a lack of suitable dosimeters. We focus on the capability of a small optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter. The aim of this study is to propose a practical method for using an OSL dosimeter to measure the ESD when performing a CT examination. The small OSL dosimeter has an outer width of 10 mm; it is assumed that a partial dose may be measured because the slice thickness and helical pitch can be set to various values. To verify our method, we used a CT scanner having 320 rows of detectors and checked the consistencies of the ESDs measured using OSL dosimeters by comparing them with those measured using Gafchromic™ films. The films were calibrated using an ionization chamber on the basis of half-value layer estimation. On the other hand, the OSL dosimeter was appropriately calibrated using a practical calibration curve previously proposed by our group. The ESDs measured using the OSL dosimeters were in good agreement with the reference ESDs from the Gafchromic™ films. Using these data, we also estimated the uncertainty of ESDs measured with small OSL dosimeters. We concluded that a small OSL dosimeter can be considered suitable for measuring the ESD with an uncertainty of 30 % during CT examinations in which pitch factors below 1.000 are applied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Entrance surface dose; Gafchromic™ film; OSL dosimeter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341805     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-016-0366-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  25 in total

1.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.

Authors:  Lee W Goldman
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2007-11-15

3.  Comparative dose evaluations between XVI and OBI cone beam CT systems using Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters.

Authors:  Tawfik Giaddui; Yunfeng Cui; James Galvin; Yan Yu; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Dianna D Cody; John M Boone; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Yoshitake Yamada; Masahiro Jinzaki; Takahiro Hosokawa; Yutaka Tanami; Hiroaki Sugiura; Takayuki Abe; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Estimation of identification limit for a small-type OSL dosimeter on the medical images by measurement of X-ray spectra.

Authors:  Kazuki Takegami; Hiroaki Hayashi; Hiroki Okino; Natsumi Kimoto; Itsumi Maehata; Yuki Kanazawa; Tohru Okazaki; Takuya Hashizume; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-03

7.  Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.

Authors:  Xinhui Duan; Jia Wang; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Katharine L Grant; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Entrance skin dosimetry and size-specific dose estimate from pediatric chest CTA.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra; Xinhua Li; Kavita Gulati; Sarabjeet Singh; Bob Liu; Mannudeep K Kalra; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2013-08-23

9.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Dose evaluation for skin and organ in hepatocellular carcinoma during angiographic procedure.

Authors:  Daniela D'Alessio; Claudia Giliberti; Antonella Soriani; Livio Carpanese; Giuseppe Pizzi; Giulio Vallati; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hasegawa; Jiro Sato; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-02-27

2.  Direct measurement of radiation exposure dose to individual organs during diagnostic computed tomography examination.

Authors:  Kazuta Yamashita; Kosaku Higashino; Hiroaki Hayashi; Kazuki Takegami; Fumio Hayashi; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Pulsation and Collimation During Fluoroscopy to Decrease Radiation: A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Kazuta Yamashita; Kosaku Higashino; Hiroaki Hayashi; Fumio Hayashi; Yoshihiro Fukui; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-12-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.