Literature DB >> 19543864

Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups.

Yona Kosashvili1, Oleg Safir, David Backstein, Dror Lakstein, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Acetabular revision of failed cages or rings may be facilitated by previously placed bone graft, enabling the use of highly porous cementless hemispheric cups. We retrospectively reviewed all 15 patients who had conversion of failed antiprotrusion cages (10 patients) or roof rings (five patients) to cementless cups. All patients had restoration of bone stock (three major column, eight morselized, four combined bone grafts) performed in conjunction with their index cage or ring reconstruction arthroplasty. The minimum followup was 24 months (average, 48.3 months; range, 24-72 months). Failure was defined as radiographic cup migration. In 12 of the 15 patients, there was no radiographic change in cup position at the last followup or symptoms indicative of loosening. The average Harris hip scores improved from 31 (range, 15-48) to 69 (range, 56-87) at latest followup. Cup failure occurred in three patients. In two patients, the failed cups were revised; the third patient refused additional surgery. Our experience suggests treatment of failed cages by highly porous cementless cups is a reasonable option. However, we recommend patients be followed closely to detect cup migration, which can occur until satisfactory bony ingrowth occurs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543864      PMCID: PMC2807016          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0935-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results.

Authors:  Thomas A Gruen; Robert A Poggie; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Randall J Lewis; Thomas J O'Keefe; S David Stulberg; Charles J Sutherland
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Constrained acetabular liners: mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Andrew G Yun; Douglas Padgett; Paul Pellicci; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The treatment of acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Michael O'Rourke; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Michael O'Rourke; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Constrained liners in revision: total hip arthroplasty an overuse syndrome: in opposition.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brett Levine; Craig J Della Valle; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Daniel A Oakes; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The incorporation of morselized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Gracia Etienne; Hari P Bezwada; David S Hungerford; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone.

Authors:  C L Peters; M Curtain; K M Samuelson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  10 in total

1.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Otto Aufranc Award: Demineralized bone matrix around porous implants promotes rapid gap healing and bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Letitia Lim; J Dennis Bobyn; Kristian M Bobyn; Louis-Philippe Lefebvre; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Bandar M Hetaimish; Paul R Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kmieć; Tomasz Dorman; Grzegorzewski Andrzej; Marek Synder; Piotr Kozłowski; Marcin Sibiński
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-10

10.  Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Chen-Heng Hsu; Chih-Chien Hu; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Yu-Han Chang; Hsin-Nung Shih; Chun-Chieh Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.