Literature DB >> 15991138

The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision.

Scott M Sporer1, Michael O'Rourke, Wayne G Paprosky.   

Abstract

Pelvic discontinuity is frequently encountered during acetabular revision in patients with severe acetabular bone loss. Prompt recognition of the discontinuity and appropriate intraoperative management are essential for a successful clinical outcome. The treatment of the discontinuity is dependent upon the remaining host bone, the potential for healing of the discontinuity, and the potential for biologic ingrowth of acetabular components. If healing potential of the discontinuity exists, the discontinuity should be treated in compression with a posterior column plate and structural allograft or with the use of trabecular metal acting as an internal plate. If healing potential for the discontinuity does not exist, the discontinuity can be bridged and treated in distraction with either an acetabular transplant supported with a cage or with the use of a custom Triflange implant. However, the poor clinical results observed with either of these treatment modalities for a type IIIB defect with an associated pelvic discontinuity have prompted the senior author to explore the use of a trabecular metal acetabular component with 1 or 2 augments in the majority of his current type IIIB cases. The long-term clinical results of this treatment remain unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15991138     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

2.  Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.

Authors:  Daniel J Del Gaizo; Vamsi Kancherla; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Management of periprosthetic acetabular fractures in elderly patients--a minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Ralph Zettl; Daphne Eschbach; Steffen Ruchholtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; John J Bottros; Jonah B Hulst; Vamsi K Kancherla; Mario Moric; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Oleg Safir; David Backstein; Dror Lakstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular Cup Revision.

Authors:  Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

7.  Decision/therapeutic algorithm for acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Olivero; Paolo Di Benedetto; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.