Literature DB >> 19543753

In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.

Qun Xia1, Shaobai Wang, Peter G Passias, Michal Kozanek, Gang Li, Brian E Grottkau, Kirkham B Wood, Guoan Li.   

Abstract

The study design included an in vivo laboratory study. The objective of the study is to quantify the kinematics of the lumbar spinous processes in asymptomatic patients during un-restricted functional body movements with physiological weight bearing. Limited data has been reported on the motion patterns of the posterior spine elements. This information is necessary for the evaluation of traumatic injuries and degenerative changes in the posterior elements, as well as for improving the surgical treatment of spinal diseases using posterior procedures. Eight asymptomatic subjects with an age ranging from 50 to 60 years underwent MRI scans of their lumbar segments in a supine position and 3D models of L2-5 were constructed. Next, each subject was asked to stand and was positioned in the following sequence: standing, 45 degrees flexion, maximal extension, maximal left and right twisting, while two orthogonal fluoroscopic images were taken simultaneously at each of the positions. The MRI models were matched to the osseous outlines of the images from the two orthogonal views to quantify the position of the vertebrae in 3D at each position. The data revealed that interspinous process (ISP) distance decreased from L2 to L3 to L4 to L5 when measured in the supine position; with significantly higher values at L2-3 and L3-4 compared with L4-5. These differences were not seen with weight-bearing conditions. During the maximal extension, the ISP distance at the L2-3 motion segment was significantly reduced, but no significant changes were detected at L3-4 and L4-5. During flexion the ISP distances were not significantly different than those measured in the MRI position at all segments. Going from the left to right twist positions, the L4-5 segment had greater amounts of ISP rotation, while all segments had similar ranges of translation in the transverse plane. The interspinous process distances were dependent on body posture and vertebral level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543753      PMCID: PMC2899540          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1068-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Determination of inter-spinous process distance in the lumbar spine. Evaluation of reference population to facilitate detection of severe trauma.

Authors:  P Neumann; Y Wang; J Kärrholm; H Malchau; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Development and validation of a new technique for assessing lumbar spine motion.

Authors:  Sai-wing Lee; Kris W N Wong; Man-kwong Chan; Hon-ming Yeung; Jeffrey L F Chiu; John C Y Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Louis E DeFrate; Sang Eun Park; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Measurement of vertebral kinematics using noninvasive image matching method-validation and application.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Peter Passias; Gang Li; Guoan Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results.

Authors:  T Steffen; R K Rubin; H G Baramki; J Antoniou; D Marchesi; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Joshua C Richards; Sharmila Majumdar; Derek P Lindsey; Gary S Beaupré; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Investigation of in vivo 6DOF total knee arthoplasty kinematics using a dual orthogonal fluoroscopic system.

Authors:  George R Hanson; Jeremy F Suggs; Andrew A Freiberg; Sridar Durbhakula; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Kyle E Swanson; Paul Fuchs; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Motion characteristics of the lumbar spinous processes with degenerative disc disease and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Qi Yao; Shaobai Wang; Jae-Hyuk Shin; Guoan Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozánek; Peter G Passias; Frederick L Mansfield; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-10

5.  A combined numerical and experimental technique for estimation of the forces and moments in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Hemanth R Gadikota; Jun Miao; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Absolute and relative reliability of lumbar interspinous process ultrasound imaging measurements.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tozawa; Munenori Katoh; Hidefumi Aramaki; Tsubasa Kawasaki; Yuichi Nishikawa; Tsuneo Kumamoto; Osamu Fujinawa
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-08-31

7.  Relationships between lumbar inter-vertebral motion and lordosis in healthy adult males: a cross sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Alister du Rose; Alan Breen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous processes during axial rotation in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease lateral lumbar interbody fusion and intervention.

Authors:  BaoLiang Zhang; Wenhan Huang; Hong Xia; Xinglong Feng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Spinous Process Inclination in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Individuals.

Authors:  Janan Abbas; Natan Peled; Israel Hershkovitz; Kamal Hamoud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.