Literature DB >> 10483828

Determination of inter-spinous process distance in the lumbar spine. Evaluation of reference population to facilitate detection of severe trauma.

P Neumann1, Y Wang, J Kärrholm, H Malchau, A Nordwall.   

Abstract

Fracture of a spinal segment with minimal or no compression of the vertebral body can be highly unstable. Screening for such an injury in the lumbar spine is often obstructed in a multi-injured patient, because of difficulty in obtaining adequate sagittal radiographs. The position of the spinous processes in relation to each other is the key for proper evaluation of the status of the posterior stabilising structures. The amount of separation or axial rotation of the posterior part of the vertebra that can occur before failure of the posterior structures has not been unambiguously defined. Despite this, it can be assumed that severe separation of the spinous processes indicates a more or less pronounced loss of mechanical support. An analysis of how the posterior spinous processes relate to each other on an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph could obviate this problem. A new, simple and reproducible radiographic tool is presented for screening of an eventual rupture of posterior structures of the lumbar spine. This method is based on measurements of the variation in interspinal process distance between adjacent levels in lumbar spine in a normal population. Two hundred normal AP radiographs of non-injured thoracolumbar spine were studied. The interspinal process distance was measured as the distance between the cranial ends of the adjacent projections of spinous processes on AP radiographs. The mean values and 99% confidence limits for changes in the interspinal process distances between adjacent spinal levels were determined and analysed in relation to age, gender and spinal segment level. An upper limit of a normal difference in distance between the spinous processes at two adjacent levels was determined to be 7-10 mm, depending on age and location in the lumbar spine. A difference in interspinal process distance exceeding 7 mm between two adjacent lumbar levels should alert a surgeon to severe and unstable injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10483828      PMCID: PMC3611179          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  [Type B injuries of the thoracolumbar spine : misinterpretations of the integrity of the posterior ligament complex using radiologic diagnostics].

Authors:  K J Schnake; F von Scotti; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Motion characteristics of the lumbar spinous processes with degenerative disc disease and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Qi Yao; Shaobai Wang; Jae-Hyuk Shin; Guoan Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozánek; Peter G Passias; Frederick L Mansfield; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-10

5.  In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.

Authors:  Qun Xia; Shaobai Wang; Peter G Passias; Michal Kozanek; Gang Li; Brian E Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Classifying thoracolumbar fractures: role of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Pablo Tomás Muñoz; Elena Moya Sánchez; Marta Revelles Paniza; Alberto Martínez Martínez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

7.  Inter-spinous process distance: a novel parameter predicting segmental lordosis during posterior cervical spine deformity surgery.

Authors:  Takayoshi Shimizu; Suthipas Pongmanee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Residual mobility of instrumented and non-fused segments in thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Ratko Yurac; Bartolomé Marré; Alejandro Urzua; Milan Munjin; Miguel A Lecaros
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

10.  Posterior vertebral injury; is this a burst fracture or a flexion-distraction injury?

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.