Literature DB >> 15803075

The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Joshua C Richards1, Sharmila Majumdar, Derek P Lindsey, Gary S Beaupré, Scott A Yerby.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The spinal canal and neural foramina dimensions of cadaver lumbar spines were quantified during flexion and extension using magnetic resonance imaging before and after placement of an interspinous process implant.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of the implant on the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramina during flexion and extension. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication symptoms are typically exacerbated during extension and relieved during flexion. It is understood that the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramen increase in flexion and decrease in extension. The authors hypothesized that an interspinous process implant would significantly prevent narrowing of the canal and foramina in extension and have no significant effect in flexion.
METHODS: Eight L2-L5 specimens were positioned to 15 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension using a positioning frame. Each specimen was magnetic resonance imaged with and without an interspinous implant (X STOP) placed between the L3-L4 spinous processes. Canal and foramina dimensions were compared between the intact and implanted specimens using a repeated measures analysis of variance with a level of significance of 0.05.
RESULTS: In extension, the implant significantly increased the canal area by 18% (231-273 mm), the subarticular diameter by 50% (2.5-3.7 mm), the canal diameter by 10% (17.8-19.5 mm), the foraminal area by 25% (106-133 mm), and the foraminal width by 41% (3.4-4.8 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the X STOP interspinous process implant prevents narrowing of the spinal canal and foramina in extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15803075     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  61 in total

1.  The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Frederick L Mansfield; Guohua Lü; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  [Longterm results of the interspinous spacer X-STOP].

Authors:  A Reinhardt; S Hufnagel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of an interfacet joint decompression and stabilization system.

Authors:  Jeremi M Leasure; Jenni Buckley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozánek; Peter G Passias; Frederick L Mansfield; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-10

6.  In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.

Authors:  Qun Xia; Shaobai Wang; Peter G Passias; Michal Kozanek; Gang Li; Brian E Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex).

Authors:  Seong-Cheol Park; Sang Hoon Yoon; Yong-Pyo Hong; Ki-Jeong Kim; Sang-Ki Chung; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

8.  Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Klaus Schlüter-Brust; Thomas Kaulhausen; Marc Röllinghoff; Britta Joswig; Hartmut Stützer; Peer Eysel; Patrick Simons; Johannes Kuchta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Siddarth M Shah; Yau Hong Ng; Vinodh Kumar Pannierselvam; Sudeep Dasde; Liang Shen
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

10.  An anatomic study of the interspinous space of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  John S Albietz; Patricia Rosasarellano; Jennifer C Fleming; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; Christopher S Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.