Literature DB >> 19539016

On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Frédéric Apoux1, Eric W Healy.   

Abstract

The number of auditory filter outputs required to identify phonemes was estimated in two experiments. Stimuli were divided into 30 contiguous equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERB(N)) spanning 80-7563Hz. Normal-hearing listeners were presented with limited numbers of bands having frequency locations determined randomly from trial to trial to provide a general view, i.e., irrespective of specific band location, of the number of 1-ERB(N)-wide speech bands needed to identify phonemes. The first experiment demonstrated that 20 such bands are required to accurately identify vowels, and 16 are required to identify consonants. In the second experiment, speech-shaped noise or time-reversed speech was introduced to the non-speech bands at various signal-to-noise ratios. Considerably elevated noise levels were necessary to substantially affect phoneme recognition, confirming a high degree of channel independence in the auditory system. The independence observed between auditory filter outputs supports current views of speech recognition in noise in which listeners extract and combine pieces of information randomly distributed both in time and frequency. These findings also suggest that the ability to partition incoming sounds into a large number of narrow bands, an ability often lost in cases of hearing impairment or cochlear implantation, is critical for speech recognition in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19539016      PMCID: PMC2801594          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  42 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Capture of attention in selective frequency listening.

Authors:  T J Green; J D McKeown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the perception of speech.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Richard M Warren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.

Authors:  José R Benkí
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Spectral integration of synchronous and asynchronous cues to consonant identification.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intelligibility of bandpass filtered speech: steepness of slopes required to eliminate transition band contributions.

Authors:  Richard M Warren; James A Bashford; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Information extraction from contralateral cues in the detection of signals of uncertain frequency.

Authors:  J D Gilliom; W M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sarah E Yoho; Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The optimal threshold for removing noise from speech is similar across normal and impaired hearing-a time-frequency masking study.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measuring time-frequency importance functions of speech with bubble noise.

Authors:  Michael I Mandel; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.