Literature DB >> 20968378

Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Frédéric Apoux1, Eric W Healy.   

Abstract

The present study examined the relative influence of the off- and on-frequency spectral components of modulated and unmodulated maskers on consonant recognition. Stimuli were divided into 30 contiguous equivalent rectangular bandwidths. The temporal fine structure (TFS) in each "target" band was either left intact or replaced with tones using vocoder processing. Recognition scores for 10, 15 and 20 target bands randomly located in frequency were obtained in quiet and in the presence of all 30 masker bands, only the off-frequency masker bands, or only the on-frequency masker bands. The amount of masking produced by the on-frequency bands was generally comparable to that produced by the broadband masker. However, the difference between these two conditions was often significant, indicating an influence of the off-frequency masker bands, likely through modulation interference or spectral restoration. Although vocoder processing systematically lead to poorer consonant recognition scores, the deficit observed in noise could often be attributed to that observed in quiet. These data indicate that (i) speech recognition is affected by the off-frequency components of the background and (ii) the nature of the target TFS does not systematically affect speech recognition in noise, especially when energetic masking and/or the number of target bands is limited.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968378      PMCID: PMC2981119          DOI: 10.1121/1.3478845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly.

Authors:  G A Takahashi; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

5.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A comparison among three measures of cross-spectral processing of amplitude modulation with tonal signals.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modulation detection interference: some spectral effects.

Authors:  S P Bacon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Eric R Thompson; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sarah E Yoho; Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Use of a compound approach to derive auditory-filter-wide frequency-importance functions for vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition for multiple bands: Implications for the Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

9.  Band importance for sentences and words reexamined.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Evidence for independent time-unit processing of speech using noise promoting or suppressing masking release (L).

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Carla L Youngdahl; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.