Literature DB >> 18529195

Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet.

Frédéric Apoux1, Sid P Bacon.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of critical bandwidth and frequency region on the use of temporal envelope cues for speech. In both experiments, spectral details were reduced using vocoder processing. In experiment 1, consonant identification scores were measured in a condition for which the cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor was half the critical bandwidth (HCB) of the auditory filters centered on each analysis band. Results showed that performance is similar to those obtained in conditions for which the envelope cutoff was set to 160 Hz or above. Experiment 2 evaluated the impact of setting the cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor to values of 4, 8, and 16 Hz or to HCB in one or two contiguous bands for an eight-band vocoder. The cutoff was set to 16 Hz for all the other bands. Overall, consonant identification was not affected by removing envelope fluctuations above 4 Hz in the low- and high-frequency bands. In contrast, speech intelligibility decreased as the cutoff frequency was decreased in the midfrequency region from 16 to 4 Hz. The behavioral results were fairly consistent with a physical analysis of the stimuli, suggesting that clearly measurable envelope fluctuations cannot be attenuated without affecting speech intelligibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18529195      PMCID: PMC2811548          DOI: 10.1121/1.2897916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  A method to determine the speech transmission index from speech waveforms.

Authors:  K L Payton; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?

Authors:  B J Kwon; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors:  O Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of contrasting temporal amplitude patterns in the perception of speech.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Richard M Warren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Sheng Liu; Ginger Stickney; Elsa Del Rio; Ying-Yee Kong; Hongbin Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth.

Authors:  Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Deborah Stanton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Relative contribution of target and masker temporal fine structure to the unmasking of consonants in noise.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Predicted effects of sensorineural hearing loss on across-fiber envelope coding in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the mechanisms involved in the recovery of envelope information from temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Rebecca E Millman; Neal F Viemeister; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Relative Weights of Temporal Envelope Cues in Different Frequency Regions for Mandarin Vowel, Consonant, and Lexical Tone Recognition.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng; Keyi Li; Gang Feng; Yang Guo; Yinan Li; Lili Xiao; Chengqi Liu; Shouhuan He; Zhen Zhang; Di Qian; Yanmei Feng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.