MOTIVATION: Quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics requires protein-level estimates and associated confidence measures. Challenges include the presence of low quality or incorrectly identified peptides and informative missingness. Furthermore, models are required for rolling peptide-level information up to the protein level. RESULTS: We present a statistical model that carefully accounts for informative missingness in peak intensities and allows unbiased, model-based, protein-level estimation and inference. The model is applicable to both label-based and label-free quantitation experiments. We also provide automated, model-based, algorithms for filtering of proteins and peptides as well as imputation of missing values. Two LC/MS datasets are used to illustrate the methods. In simulation studies, our methods are shown to achieve substantially more discoveries than standard alternatives. AVAILABILITY: The software has been made available in the open-source proteomics platform DAnTE (http://omics.pnl.gov/software/).
MOTIVATION: Quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics requires protein-level estimates and associated confidence measures. Challenges include the presence of low quality or incorrectly identified peptides and informative missingness. Furthermore, models are required for rolling peptide-level information up to the protein level. RESULTS: We present a statistical model that carefully accounts for informative missingness in peak intensities and allows unbiased, model-based, protein-level estimation and inference. The model is applicable to both label-based and label-free quantitation experiments. We also provide automated, model-based, algorithms for filtering of proteins and peptides as well as imputation of missing values. Two LC/MS datasets are used to illustrate the methods. In simulation studies, our methods are shown to achieve substantially more discoveries than standard alternatives. AVAILABILITY: The software has been made available in the open-source proteomics platform DAnTE (http://omics.pnl.gov/software/).
Authors: O Troyanskaya; M Cantor; G Sherlock; P Brown; T Hastie; R Tibshirani; D Botstein; R B Altman Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Weixun Wang; Haihong Zhou; Hua Lin; Sushmita Roy; Thomas A Shaler; Lander R Hill; Scott Norton; Praveen Kumar; Markus Anderle; Christopher H Becker Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić; Christophe Masselon; Richard C Barry; Yufeng Shen; Richard D Smith Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: William M Old; Karen Meyer-Arendt; Lauren Aveline-Wolf; Kevin G Pierce; Alex Mendoza; Joel R Sevinsky; Katheryn A Resing; Natalie G Ahn Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Gary R Kiebel; Ken J Auberry; Navdeep Jaitly; David A Clark; Matthew E Monroe; Elena S Peterson; Nikola Tolić; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith Journal: Proteomics Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Elizabeth G Hill; John H Schwacke; Susana Comte-Walters; Elizabeth H Slate; Ann L Oberg; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Terry M Therneau; Kevin L Schey Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2008-06-26 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Yuliya V Karpievitch; Thomas Taverner; Joshua N Adkins; Stephen J Callister; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith; Alan R Dabney Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Tom Taverner; Yuliya V Karpievitch; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Joseph N Brown; Alan R Dabney; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 6.937