MOTIVATION: Quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics involves statistical inference on protein abundance, based on the intensities of each protein's associated spectral peaks. However, typical MS-based proteomics datasets have substantial proportions of missing observations, due at least in part to censoring of low intensities. This complicates intensity-based differential expression analysis. RESULTS: We outline a statistical method for protein differential expression, based on a simple Binomial likelihood. By modeling peak intensities as binary, in terms of 'presence/absence,' we enable the selection of proteins not typically amenable to quantitative analysis; e.g. 'one-state' proteins that are present in one condition but absent in another. In addition, we present an analysis protocol that combines quantitative and presence/absence analysis of a given dataset in a principled way, resulting in a single list of selected proteins with a single-associated false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY: All R code available here: http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~adabney/share/xuan_code.zip.
MOTIVATION: Quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics involves statistical inference on protein abundance, based on the intensities of each protein's associated spectral peaks. However, typical MS-based proteomics datasets have substantial proportions of missing observations, due at least in part to censoring of low intensities. This complicates intensity-based differential expression analysis. RESULTS: We outline a statistical method for protein differential expression, based on a simple Binomial likelihood. By modeling peak intensities as binary, in terms of 'presence/absence,' we enable the selection of proteins not typically amenable to quantitative analysis; e.g. 'one-state' proteins that are present in one condition but absent in another. In addition, we present an analysis protocol that combines quantitative and presence/absence analysis of a given dataset in a principled way, resulting in a single list of selected proteins with a single-associated false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY: All R code available here: http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~adabney/share/xuan_code.zip.
Authors: Richard D Smith; Gordon A Anderson; Mary S Lipton; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Yufeng Shen; Thomas P Conrads; Timothy D Veenstra; Harold R Udseth Journal: Proteomics Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Weixun Wang; Haihong Zhou; Hua Lin; Sushmita Roy; Thomas A Shaler; Lander R Hill; Scott Norton; Praveen Kumar; Markus Anderle; Christopher H Becker Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Yuliya Karpievitch; Jeff Stanley; Thomas Taverner; Jianhua Huang; Joshua N Adkins; Charles Ansong; Fred Heffron; Thomas O Metz; Wei-Jun Qian; Hyunjin Yoon; Richard D Smith; Alan R Dabney Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Qibin Zhang; Matthew E Monroe; Athena A Schepmoes; Therese R W Clauss; Marina A Gritsenko; Da Meng; Vladislav A Petyuk; Richard D Smith; Thomas O Metz Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: K Bach-Ngohou; K Ouguerram; H Nazih; P Maugère; B Ripolles-Piquer; Y Zaïr; R Frénais; M Krempf; J M Bard Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-11
Authors: Pietro Cirillo; Michael S Gersch; Wei Mu; Philip M Scherer; Kyung Mee Kim; Loreto Gesualdo; George N Henderson; Richard J Johnson; Yuri Y Sautin Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: So Young Ryu; Wei-Jun Qian; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Ronald G Tompkins; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Melissa M Matzke; Joseph N Brown; Marina A Gritsenko; Thomas O Metz; Joel G Pounds; Karin D Rodland; Anil K Shukla; Richard D Smith; Katrina M Waters; Jason E McDermott; Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson Journal: Proteomics Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.984