Literature DB >> 26598639

QuantFusion: Novel Unified Methodology for Enhanced Coverage and Precision in Quantifying Global Proteomic Changes in Whole Tissues.

Harsha P Gunawardena1, Jonathon O'Brien2, John A Wrobel1, Ling Xie1, Sherri R Davies3, Shunqiang Li3, Matthew J Ellis4, Bahjat F Qaqish2, Xian Chen5.   

Abstract

Single quantitative platforms such as label-based or label-free quantitation (LFQ) present compromises in accuracy, precision, protein sequence coverage, and speed of quantifiable proteomic measurements. To maximize the quantitative precision and the number of quantifiable proteins or the quantifiable coverage of tissue proteomes, we have developed a unified approach, termed QuantFusion, that combines the quantitative ratios of all peptides measured by both LFQ and label-based methodologies. Here, we demonstrate the use of QuantFusion in determining the proteins differentially expressed in a pair of patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) representing two major breast cancer (BC) subtypes, basal and luminal. Label-based in-spectra quantitative peptides derived from amino acid-coded tagging (AACT, also known as SILAC) of a non-malignant mammary cell line were uniformly added to each xenograft with a constant predefined ratio, from which Ratio-of-Ratio estimates were obtained for the label-free peptides paired with AACT peptides in each PDX tumor. A mixed model statistical analysis was used to determine global differential protein expression by combining complementary quantifiable peptide ratios measured by LFQ and Ratio-of-Ratios, respectively. With minimum number of replicates required for obtaining the statistically significant ratios, QuantFusion uses the distinct mechanisms to "rescue" the missing data inherent to both LFQ and label-based quantitation. Combined quantifiable peptide data from both quantitative schemes increased the overall number of peptide level measurements and protein level estimates. In our analysis of the PDX tumor proteomes, QuantFusion increased the number of distinct peptide ratios by 65%, representing differentially expressed proteins between the BC subtypes. This quantifiable coverage improvement, in turn, not only increased the number of measurable protein fold-changes by 8% but also increased the average precision of quantitative estimates by 181% so that some BC subtypically expressed proteins were rescued by QuantFusion. Thus, incorporating data from multiple quantitative approaches while accounting for measurement variability at both the peptide and global protein levels make QuantFusion unique for obtaining increased coverage and quantitative precision for tissue proteomes.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598639      PMCID: PMC4739686          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O115.049791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  40 in total

1.  Amino acid residue specific stable isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Haining Zhu; Songqin Pan; Sheng Gu; E Morton Bradbury; Xian Chen
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  An experimental correction for arginine-to-proline conversion artifacts in SILAC-based quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Dennis Van Hoof; Martijn W H Pinkse; Dorien Ward-Van Oostwaard; Christine L Mummery; Albert J R Heck; Jeroen Krijgsveld
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A map of general and specialized chromatin readers in mouse tissues generated by label-free interaction proteomics.

Authors:  H Christian Eberl; Cornelia G Spruijt; Christian D Kelstrup; Michiel Vermeulen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Jing Wang; Xiaojing Wang; Jing Zhu; Qi Liu; Zhiao Shi; Matthew C Chambers; Lisa J Zimmerman; Kent F Shaddox; Sangtae Kim; Sherri R Davies; Sean Wang; Pei Wang; Christopher R Kinsinger; Robert C Rivers; Henry Rodriguez; R Reid Townsend; Matthew J C Ellis; Steven A Carr; David L Tabb; Robert J Coffey; Robbert J C Slebos; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  SILAC surrogates: rescue of quantitative information for orphan analytes in spike-in SILAC experiments.

Authors:  Jason M Gilmore; Jeffrey A Milloy; Scott A Gerber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Large-scale multiplexed quantitative discovery proteomics enabled by the use of an (18)O-labeled "universal" reference sample.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Qian; Tao Liu; Vladislav A Petyuk; Marina A Gritsenko; Brianne O Petritis; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Amit Kaushal; Wenzhong Xiao; Celeste C Finnerty; Marc G Jeschke; Navdeep Jaitly; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft.

Authors:  Li Ding; Matthew J Ellis; Shunqiang Li; David E Larson; Ken Chen; John W Wallis; Christopher C Harris; Michael D McLellan; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda L Fulton; Rachel M Abbott; Jeremy Hoog; David J Dooling; Daniel C Koboldt; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki; Qunyuan Zhang; Lei Chen; Ling Lin; Michael C Wendl; Joshua F McMichael; Vincent J Magrini; Lisa Cook; Sean D McGrath; Tammi L Vickery; Elizabeth Appelbaum; Katherine Deschryver; Sherri Davies; Therese Guintoli; Li Lin; Robert Crowder; Yu Tao; Jacqueline E Snider; Scott M Smith; Adam F Dukes; Gabriel E Sanderson; Craig S Pohl; Kim D Delehaunty; Catrina C Fronick; Kimberley A Pape; Jerry S Reed; Jody S Robinson; Jennifer S Hodges; William Schierding; Nathan D Dees; Dong Shen; Devin P Locke; Madeline E Wiechert; James M Eldred; Josh B Peck; Benjamin J Oberkfell; Justin T Lolofie; Feiyu Du; Amy E Hawkins; Michelle D O'Laughlin; Kelly E Bernard; Mark Cunningham; Glendoria Elliott; Mark D Mason; Dominic M Thompson; Jennifer L Ivanovich; Paul J Goodfellow; Charles M Perou; George M Weinstock; Rebecca Aft; Mark Watson; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Identification of prognostic genes for recurrent risk prediction in triple negative breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Lee H Chen; Wen-Hung Kuo; Mong-Hsun Tsai; Pei-Chun Chen; Chuhsing K Hsiao; Eric Y Chuang; Li-Yun Chang; Fon-Jou Hsieh; Liang-Chuan Lai; King-Jen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Marco Y Hein; Christian A Luber; Igor Paron; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  2 in total

1.  Kinome Profiling of Primary Endometrial Tumors Using Multiplexed Inhibitor Beads and Mass Spectrometry Identifies SRPK1 as Candidate Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Alison M Kurimchak; Vikas Kumar; Carlos Herrera-Montávez; Katherine J Johnson; Nishi Srivastava; Karthik Davarajan; Suraj Peri; Kathy Q Cai; Gina M Mantia-Smaldone; James S Duncan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Rapid Screening of Ellagitannins in Natural Sources via Targeted Reporter Ion Triggered Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jeremiah J Bowers; Harsha P Gunawardena; Anaëlle Cornu; Ashwini S Narvekar; Antoine Richieu; Denis Deffieux; Stéphane Quideau; Nishanth Tharayil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.