| Literature DB >> 19515264 |
Do Kyung Lee1, Seok Jang, Eun Hye Baek, Mi Jin Kim, Kyung Soon Lee, Hea Soon Shin, Myung Jun Chung, Jin Eung Kim, Kang Oh Lee, Nam Joo Ha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are beneficial probiotic organisms that contribute to improved nutrition, microbial balance, and immuno-enhancement of the intestinal tract, as well as lower cholesterol. Although present in many foods, most trials have been in spreads or dairy products. Here we tested whether Bifidobacteria isolates could lower cholesterol, inhibit harmful enzyme activities, and control fecal water content.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19515264 PMCID: PMC2707375 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-8-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
List of lactic acid bacteria used in this study
| Bacterial strains | Source | Origin |
| Isolatea | Human feces | |
| Isolate | Human feces | |
| Isolate | Human feces | |
| Commercialb | Intestine of adult | |
| Commercial | Intestine of adult | |
| Commercial | NAc | |
| Commercial | NA | |
| Commercial | NA | |
| Isolate | Human feces |
aIsolated from healthy Korean
bPurchased from Korean Collection for Type Culture (KCTC)
cNot available
Compositions of high-cholesterol diets for SD rats
| Ingredients | Compositions | |
| g | kcal | |
| Casein (from milk) | 200 | 800 |
| Corn Starch | 155.036 | 620 |
| Sucrose | 50 | 200 |
| Dextrose | 132 | 528 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 0 |
| Soybean Oil | 25 | 225 |
| Lard | 175 | 1575 |
| Mineral Mixture | 35 | 0 |
| Vitamin Mixture | 10 | 40 |
| TBHQ | 0.014 | 0 |
| DL-Methionine | 0 | 0 |
| L-Cystine | 3 | 12 |
| Choline Bitartrate | 2.5 | 0 |
| Total | 838 | 4,000 |
| Cholesterol | 20 g/kg | (2%) |
| Cholic acid | 5 g/kg | (0.5%) |
Figure 1Sequence analyses of the .
Amount of residual cholesterol after in vitro incubation of selected lactic acid bacteria
| Species | Residual cholesterol | Cholesterol lowering ratio (%) | |
| Controla | 345.0 ± 5.7b | - | - |
| 318.7 ± 3.0 | 7.6 | ||
| 262.8 ± 1.3 | 23.8 | ||
| 283.3 ± 2.6 | 17.9 | ||
| 329.0 ± 5.6 | 4.6 | ||
| 303.8 ± 6.0 | 11.9 | ||
| 321.7 ± 1.9 | 6.7 | ||
| 314.0 ± 4.4 | 9.0 | ||
| 296.3 ± 5.0 | 14.1 | ||
| 300.9 ± 1.7 | 12.8 |
aMRS broth containing cholesterol without lactic acid bacteria
bEach value provided is the mean ± SD
cp < 0.05 significantly different compared with control
Effects of the B. longum SPM1207 on serum total-, HDL-, and LDL-cholesterol of SD rats fed on a high-cholesterol diet
| Index | Basal diet | High-cholesterol diet | ||
| Control | SPM1207b | |||
| Total cholesterol | 55.0 ± 5.5a | 111.3 ± 25.2 | 84.8 ± 4.3 | |
| HDLe-cholesterol | 23.9 ± 1.4 | 30.0 ± 2.6 | 30.6 ± 1.5 | NSd |
| LDLf-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 11.6 ± 1.1 | 33.3 ± 8.5 | 23.5 ± 2.3 | |
aEach value provided is the mean ± SD for 8 rats.
bBifidobacterium longum SPM1207 isolated from healthy Korean.
cp < 0.05 significantly different compared with control.
dNS: not significant.
eHDL: high density lipoprotein,
fLDL: low density lipoprotein
Figure 2Effect of . All rats were acclimatized to the respective diets for a week. Then the rats in group 2 or 3 received daily 0.2 ml saline or B. longum SPM1207 (108~109 CFU/ml), respectively, for 2 weeks. Data are presented as means and standard deviation. *p < 0.05 significantly different compared with 1 week.
Figure 3Changes in body weight fed experimental diets for 3 weeks. All rats were acclimatized to the respective diets for a week. Then the rats in group 2 or 3 received daily 0.2 ml saline or B. longum SPM1207 (108~109 CFU/ml), respectively, for 2 weeks. Data are presented as means and standard deviation. *p < 0.05 significantly different compared with control (Cholesterol + Saline).
Figure 4Changes in total LAB counts in rats fed experimental diets for 3 weeks. All rats were acclimatized to the respective diets for a week. Then the rats in group 2 or 3 received daily 0.2 ml saline or B. longum SPM1207 (108~109 CFU/ml), respectively, for 2 weeks. Data are presented as means and standard deviation. *p < 0.05 significantly different compared with control (Cholesterol + Saline).
Figure 5. (A) Tryptophanase activity, (B) Urease activity, (C) β-glucosidase activity, (D) β-glucuronidase activity; Before: before the experiment started, After: at the end of experiment.