Literature DB >> 8108276

Antigenotoxic properties of lactic acid bacteria in vivo in the gastrointestinal tract of rats.

B L Pool-Zobel1, B Bertram, M Knoll, R Lambertz, C Neudecker, U Schillinger, P Schmezer, W H Holzapfel.   

Abstract

In view of the high incidence of dietary-related tumors, one important research goal is to identify the participating genotoxic carcinogens and the nutritional factors that may counteract their activities. We therefore have further developed a method to assess DNA damage in tumor target tissues of the gastrointestinal tract. Subsequently the prevention of this inducible DNA damage by lactic acid bacteria and by milk products fermented with probiotics was studied as well. The microgel electrophoresis technique was applied to cells of the esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and colonic mucosa. Cells were grouped according to their degree of DNA damage, the simplest measure of which is to discriminate between those with damage (comets) and those without damage. When these cells were isolated from animals treated with a genotoxic carcinogen, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), and exposed to MNNG for 1-24 hours, it was possible to follow the course of genotoxicity throughout the gastrointestinal tract. After the animals were treated with the lactic acid bacteria under study, it was possible to detect antigenotoxic properties as well. The gavage of 10(10) viable Lactobacillus casei cells in 10 ml of 0.9% NaCl per kilogram body weight immediately before the oral administration of MNNG (5 mg/kg body wt) resulted in a reduction of induced DNA damage in gastric and colonic mucosa cells. A sequential treatment schedule was even more effective: when the animals were treated orally with lactic acid bacteria or yogurt (10 ml/kg body wt) in the morning followed by MNNG (7.5 mg/kg body wt) eight hours later and the colon cells were isolated 16 hours later, the percentages of cells remaining intact were distinctly higher in the combination groups (68 +/- 10 and 68 +/- 19 for L. casei and a "Bio" yogurt, respectively) than in the group receiving only MNNG (45 +/- 17). The effect of heating L. casei was studied and was found to yield less clear-cut effects in preventing genotoxicity. The method is an efficient tool to elucidate antigenotoxic properties of food components in vivo in those target tissues actually afflicted by dietary-related tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8108276     DOI: 10.1080/01635589309514295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives on bifidobacteria as biotherapeutic agents in gastrointestinal health.

Authors:  L C Duffy; A Leavens; E Griffiths; D Dryja
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Antimutagenicity of milk fermented by Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  A Belicová; J Krajcovic; J Dobias; L Ebringer
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Microbial Metabolites as Molecular Mediators of Host-Microbe Symbiosis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  N P Hyland; A Houston; J M Keane; S A Joyce; C G M Gahan
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2020

Review 4.  A potential role of probiotics in colorectal cancer prevention: review of possible mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Esther Swee Lan Chong
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  The struggle within: microbial influences on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Janelle C Arthur; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 6.  Role of the Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer: Updates on Microbial Associations and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Olivia I Coleman; Tiago Nunes
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 7.  Pre-, pro- and synbiotics in cancer prevention and treatment-a review of basic and clinical research.

Authors:  Alasdair J Scott; Claire A Merrifield; Jessica A Younes; Elizabeth P Pekelharing
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-09-05

8.  Lactic acid bacteria affect serum cholesterol levels, harmful fecal enzyme activity, and fecal water content.

Authors:  Do Kyung Lee; Seok Jang; Eun Hye Baek; Mi Jin Kim; Kyung Soon Lee; Hea Soon Shin; Myung Jun Chung; Jin Eung Kim; Kang Oh Lee; Nam Joo Ha
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  Biological Activities of Lactose-Derived Prebiotics and Symbiotic with Probiotics on Gastrointestinal System.

Authors:  Arijit Nath; Gokce Haktanirlar; Áron Varga; Máté András Molnár; Krisztina Albert; Ildikó Galambos; András Koris; Gyula Vatai
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.