Literature DB >> 29369288

Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.

Lori J Leibold1, Emily Buss2, Lauren Calandruccio3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which infants, school-age children, and adults benefit from a target/masker sex mismatch in the context of speech detection or recognition in a background of 2 competing talkers. It was hypothesized that the ability to benefit from a target/masker sex mismatch develops between infancy and the early school-age years, as children gain listening experience in multi-talker environments.
DESIGN: Listeners were infants (7 to 13 months), children (5 to 10 years), and adults (18 to 33 years) with normal hearing. A series of five experiments compared speech detection or recognition in continuous two-talker speech across target/masker conditions that were sex matched or sex mismatched. In experiments 1 and 2, an observer-based, single-interval procedure was used to estimate speech detection thresholds for a spondaic word in a two-talker speech masker. In experiments 3 and 4, speech recognition thresholds were estimated in continuous two-talker speech using a four-alternative, forced-choice procedure. In experiment 5, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were estimated for adults using the forced-choice recognition procedure after ideal time-frequency segregation processing was applied to the stimuli.
RESULTS: Speech detection thresholds for adults tested in experiments 1 and 2 were significantly higher when the target word and speech masker were matched in sex than when they were mismatched, but thresholds for infants were similar across sex-matched and sex-mismatched conditions. Results for experiments 3 and 4 showed that school-age children and adults benefit from a target/masker sex mismatch for a forced-choice word recognition task. Children, however, obtained greater benefit than adults in 1 condition, perhaps due to greater susceptibility to masking overall. In experiment 5, adults had substantial threshold reductions and more uniform performance across the 4 conditions evaluated in experiments 3 and 4 after the application of ideal time-frequency segregation to the stimuli.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of results observed across experiments suggests that the ability to take advantage of differences in vocal characteristics typically found between speech produced by male and female talkers develops between infancy and the school-age years. Considerable child-adult differences in susceptibility to speech-in-speech masking were observed for school-age children as old as 11 years of age in both sex-matched and sex-mismatched conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29369288      PMCID: PMC6056341          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  34 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Karen S Helfer; Uma Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Linguistic input, electronic media, and communication outcomes of toddlers with hearing loss.

Authors:  Sophie E Ambrose; Mark VanDam; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effect of the relationship between target and masker sex on infants' recognition of speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  9 in total

1.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Does the semantic content or syntactic regularity of masker speech affect speech-on-speech recognition?

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Penelope Bencheck; Brandi Jett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of target/masker fundamental frequency contour similarity on masked-speech recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Peter A Wasiuk; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Jessica Kong; Ann Holmes; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Kelly M Dean; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Development of voice perception is dissociated across gender cues in school-age children.

Authors:  Leanne Nagels; Etienne Gaudrain; Deborah Vickers; Petra Hendriks; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.