Literature DB >> 15035562

Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.

William Noble1, Stuart Gatehouse.   

Abstract

A series of comparative analyses is presented between a group with relatively similar degrees of hearing loss in each ear (n = 103: symmetry group) and one with dissimilar losses (n = 50: asymmetry group). Asymmetry was defined as an interaural difference of more than 10dB in hearing levels averaged over 0.5. 1, 2 and 4kHz. Comparison was focused on self-rated disabilities as reflected in responses on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). The connections between SSQ ratings and a global self-rating of handicap were also observed. The interrelationships among SSQ items for the two groups were analysed to determine how the SSQ behaves when applied to groups in whom binaural hearing is more (asymmetry) versus less compromised. As expected, spatial hearing is severely disabled in the group with asymmetry; this group is generally more disabled than the symmetry group across all SSQ domains. In the linkages with handicap, spatial hearing, especially in dynamic settings, was strongly represented in the asymmetry group, while all aspects of hearing were moderately to strongly represented in the symmetry group. Item intercorrelations showed that speech hearing is a relatively autonomous function for the symmetry group, whereas it is enmeshed with segregation, clarity and naturalness factors for the asymmetry group. Spatial functions were more independent of others in the asymmetry group. The SSQ shows promise in the assessment of outcomes in the case of bilateral versus unilateral amplification and/or implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15035562     DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  47 in total

1.  Unilateral hearing loss is associated with worse speech-language scores in children.

Authors:  Judith E C Lieu; Nancy Tye-Murray; Roanne K Karzon; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Patient-Related Benefits for Adults with Cochlear Implantation: A Multicultural Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Lida Muller; Hanna Czerniejewska-Wolska; Hector Vallés Varela; César Orús Dotú; Marcin Durko; Alicia Huarte Irujo; Bartosz Piszczatowski; Marek Zadrożniak; Colin Irwin; Petra L Graham; Josie Wyss
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

4.  Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Lisa Cowdrey; Sarah King
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Transitioning from bimodal to bilateral cochlear implant listening: speech recognition and localization in four individuals.

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Hearing Impairment and Quality of Life in Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanhueza; Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Diego Calavia; Alicia Huarte; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

7.  Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

8.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden; Noël Y Dwyer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Ann E Perreau; Haihong Ji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.