Literature DB >> 31750232

The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing.

Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi1, Maryam Delphi2, Vafa Delphi2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was examining the relationship between a psychophysical spatial hearing test (spatial word in noise test) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Sixty-six adults (18-40 years old) were divided in three groups: normal subjects, subjects with mild and moderate hearing loss. Spatial word in noise test and Persian version of the spatial hearing questionnaire were evaluated and compared among these groups. According to Pearson's test, there was a significant positive correlation between the scores of spatial word in noise test and Persian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in three groups (r = 0.64-0.89). Hearing loss can deteriorate spatial hearing ability. Both objective and subjective spatial hearing tests are shown to be effective in detecting spatial hearing disorder. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing loss; Questionnaire; Spatial hearing; Speech-in-noise perception

Year:  2019        PMID： 31750232      PMCID： PMC6841887          DOI： 10.1007/s12070-019-01674-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN： 2231-3796


  21 in total

1.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sources of variability of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired populations.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; Celine Richard
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.

Authors:  S Theo Goverts; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory Lateralization Training Effects on Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Enayatollah Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-02

5.  Development of a Shortened Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ-S) for Screening Spatial-Hearing Ability.

Authors:  Hua Ou; Ann Perreau; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Relations between psychophysical measures of spatial hearing and self-reported spatial-hearing abilities.

Authors:  T E M Van Esch; M E Lutman; M Vormann; J Lyzenga; M Hällgren; B Larsby; S P Athalye; T Houtgast; B Kollmeier; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).

Authors:  Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers.

Authors:  Karyn L Galvin; William Noble
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-06

9.  Reliability of Interaural Time Difference-Based Localization Training in Elderly Individuals with Speech-in-Noise Perception Disorder.

Authors:  Maryam Delphi; M-Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moossavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Maryam Banimostafa
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09

10.  Validity and reliability of the Persian version of spatial hearing questionnaire.

Authors:  Maryam Delphi; Farzaneh Zamiri Abdolahi; Richard Tyler; Mahsa Bakhit; Nader Saki; Ahmad Reza Nazeri
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.