Literature DB >> 19478639

Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Yiheng Zhang1, Heang-Ping Chan, Berkman Sahiner, Jun Wei, Chuan Zhou, Lubomir M Hadjiiski.   

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammography is a promising imaging technique that has the potential to improve detection of early-stage breast cancers. Digital breast tomosynthesis mammography can provide quasi 3-dimensional information by reconstructing the breast volume from a number of low-dose mammograms acquired over a limited angular range. Previous studies have shown that iterative reconstruction methods such as simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) can give satisfactory image quality in DBT. However, because of the finite size of the detector and the limited field of view, DBT reconstruction contains artifacts caused by the truncated projection-view images. We developed methods that use a local intensity equalization strategy and a geometrical tissue-compensation method to remove two types of truncation artifacts: detector boundary discontinuity and underestimation of the attenuation path length. A custom-built breast phantom and a selected DBT case were used to evaluate the improvements. A GE (GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, USA) prototype DBT system was used to acquire 21 projection views in 3-degree increments over a +/-30-degree angular range. Experimental results demonstrated that the artifact reduction methods can improve the image quality at the boundaries with enhanced contrast-to-noise ratio and increased background uniformity, recover the obscured breast structural information, and achieve an overall reconstruction quality comparable with the quality of those without truncation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19478639      PMCID: PMC2743904          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181838000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; S P Baker; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Reconstruction from truncated projections in CT using adaptive detruncation.

Authors:  K Sourbelle; M Kachelriess; W A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Algebraic reconstruction in CT from limited views.

Authors:  A H Andersen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography.

Authors:  R Gordon; R Bender; G T Herman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Processing of incomplete measurement data in computed tomography.

Authors:  R M Lewitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Joseph Y Lo; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Asymmetric fan transmission CT on SPECT systems.

Authors:  W Chang; S Loncaric; G Huang; P Sanpitak
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  7 in total

1.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

Authors:  Mitra Noroozian; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam; Katherine A Klein; Deborah O Jeffries; Renee W Pinsky; Heang-Ping Chan; Paul L Carson; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiabei Zheng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of FBP and Iterative Algorithms with Non-Uniform Angular Sampling.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  A diffusion-based truncated projection artifact reduction method for iterative digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiabei Zheng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 10.048

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.