Literature DB >> 19472648

A method to improve accuracy and precision of water surface identification for photon depth dose measurements.

J D Ververs1, M J Schaefer, I Kawrakow, J V Siebers.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to present a method to reduce the setup error inherent in clinical depth dose measurements and, in doing so, to improve entrance dosimetry measurement reliability. Ionization chamber (IC) depth dose measurements are acquired with the depth scan extended into the air above the water surface. An inflection region is obtained in each resulting percent depth ionization (PDI) curve that can be matched against other measurements or to an inflection region obtained from an analogous Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. Measurements are made with various field sizes for the 6 and 18 MV photon beams, with and without a Pb foil in the beam, to determine the sensitivity of the dose inflection region to the beam conditions. The offset between reference and test data set inflection regions is quantified using two separate methods. When comparing sets of measured data, maxima in the second derivative of ionization are compared. When comparing measured data to MC simulation, the offset that minimizes the sum of squared differences between the reference and test curves in the ionization inflection region is found. These methods can be used to quantify the offset between an initial setup (test) position and the true surface (reference) position. The ionization inflection location is found to be insensitive to changes in field size, electron contamination, and beam energy. Data from a single reference condition should be sufficient to identify the surface location. The method of determining IC offsets is general and should be applicable to any IC and other radiation sources. The measurement method could reduce the time and effort required in the initial IC setup at a water surface as setup errors can be corrected offline. Given a reliable set of reference data to compare with, this method could increase the ability of quality assurance (QA) measurements to detect discrepancies in beam output as opposed to discrepancies in IC localization. Application of the measurement method standardizes the procedure for localizing cylindrical ICs at a water surface and thereby improves the reliability of measurements taken with these devices at all depths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19472648      PMCID: PMC5148065          DOI: 10.1118/1.3098125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

1.  Validation of Monte Carlo generated phase-space descriptions of medical linear accelerators.

Authors:  B Libby; J Siebers; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. II. Application to ion chamber response simulations.

Authors:  I Kawrakow
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version.

Authors:  I Kawrakow
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Description and dosimetric verification of the PEREGRINE Monte Carlo dose calculation system for photon beams incident on a water phantom.

Authors:  C L Hartmann Siantar; R S Walling; T P Daly; B Faddegon; N Albright; P Bergstrom; A F Bielajew; C Chuang; D Garrett; R K House; D Knapp; D J Wieczorek; L J Verhey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.

Authors:  George X Ding
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Validation of Monte Carlo calculated surface doses for megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Wamied Abdel-Rahman; Jan P Seuntjens; Frank Verhaegen; François Deblois; Ervin B Podgorsak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Technical note: overprediction of dose with default PRESTA-I boundary crossing in DOSXYZnrc and BEAMnrc.

Authors:  B R B Walters; I Kawrakow
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  On the discrepancies between Monte Carlo dose calculations and measurements for the 18 MV varian photon beam.

Authors:  Omar Chibani; C M Charlie Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Indrin J Chetty; Bruce Curran; Joanna E Cygler; John J DeMarco; Gary Ezzell; Bruce A Faddegon; Iwan Kawrakow; Paul J Keall; Helen Liu; C M Charlie Ma; D W O Rogers; Jan Seuntjens; Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.