Literature DB >> 12462709

Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.

George X Ding1.   

Abstract

This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source of electrons in the accelerator head that was not fully accounted for in the treatment head simulation. In this investigation, a lead foil is added just below the accelerator head in order to study this hypothesis. The lead foil effectively removes charged particles generated inside the accelerator head. The charged particles generated by the lead foil can be accounted for fully because the simple geometry can be simulated accurately. An 18 MV photon beam from a Varian Clinac-2100EX is measured using a WELLHOFER WP700 beam scanner with an IC-10 ionization chamber (cavity radius=3 mm). The BEAM Monte Carlo code is used in the incident beam simulations. Both EGS4/DOSXYZ and EGSnrc/DOSRZnrc are used in the dose calculations in a water phantom. The Monte Carlo calculated depth-dose curve is scaled so that it has the same values at 10 cm depth as the measured curve. It is found that the discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements remain significant in the buildup region even after applying necessary corrections to the measured data. The discrepancies have only been modestly decreased with the lead foil in place compared to the 40 x 40 cm2 open field. At a depth of 1 cm, discrepancies of about 5% are still observed in the buildup region for the field with the lead foil. Therefore a new explanation for the unresolved discrepancy remains to be found.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462709     DOI: 10.1118/1.1514237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Simulation of large x-ray fields using independently measured source and geometry details.

Authors:  D Sawkey; B A Faddegon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Output factor determination based on Monte Carlo simulation for small cone field in 10-MV photon beam.

Authors:  Kyohei Fukata; Satoru Sugimoto; Chie Kurokawa; Akito Saito; Tatsuya Inoue; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-04-04

4.  A method to improve accuracy and precision of water surface identification for photon depth dose measurements.

Authors:  J D Ververs; M J Schaefer; I Kawrakow; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT.

Authors:  Oscar I Calvo; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Sotirios Stathakis; Carlos Esquivel; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Monte carlo model and output factors of elekta infinity™ 6 and 10 MV photon beam.

Authors:  Sitti Yani; Indra Budiansah; Mohamad Fahdillah Rhani; Freddy Haryanto
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-28

7.  A Comparison Between GATE and MCNPX Monte Carlo Codes in Simulation of Medical Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Hamid-Reza Sadoughi; Shahrokh Nasseri; Mahdi Momennezhad; Hamid-Reza Sadeghi; Mohammad-Hossein Bahreyni-Toosi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2014-01

8.  Calculation of organ doses from breast cancer radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Theocharis Berris; Michael Mazonakis; John Stratakis; Antonios Tzedakis; Anastasia Fasoulaki; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Modeling the head of PRIMUS linear accelerator for electron-mode at 10 MeV for different applicators.

Authors:  Hani Negm; Moamen M O M Aly; Walaa M Fathy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.