Literature DB >> 24694120

Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Malcolm McEwen1, Larry DeWerd2, Geoffrey Ibbott3, David Followill4, David W O Rogers5, Stephen Seltzer6, Jan Seuntjens7.   

Abstract

An addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water in megavoltage photon beams is presented. This addendum continues the procedure laid out in TG-51 but new kQ data for photon beams, based on Monte Carlo simulations, are presented and recommendations are given to improve the accuracy and consistency of the protocol's implementation. The components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference point are introduced and the magnitude of each component discussed. Finally, the consistency of experimental determination of ND,w coefficients is discussed. It is expected that the implementation of this addendum will be straightforward, assuming that the user is already familiar with TG-51. The changes introduced by this report are generally minor, although new recommendations could result in procedural changes for individual users. It is expected that the effort on the medical physicist's part to implement this addendum will not be significant and could be done as part of the annual linac calibration.
© 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24694120      PMCID: PMC5148035          DOI: 10.1118/1.4866223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  76 in total

1.  Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from the NRC linac.

Authors:  D Sheikh-Bagheri; D W Rogers; C K Ross; J P Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST. National Research Council of Canada. National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Authors:  K Shortt; J Shobe; S Domen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comment on "Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies".

Authors:  M Saiful Huq
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Calculation of beam quality correction factors for various thimble ionization chambers using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.

Authors:  Fabián Erazo; Antonio M Lallena
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm R McEwen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Monte Carlo calculated results for the HDR 1000 plus.

Authors:  Tim D Bohm; Sheridan L Griffin; Paul M DeLuca; Larry A DeWerd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Determination of the recombination correction factor kS for some specific plane-parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers in pulsed photon and electron beams.

Authors:  G Bruggmoser; R Saum; A Schmachtenberg; F Schmid; E Schüle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Indrin J Chetty; Bruce Curran; Joanna E Cygler; John J DeMarco; Gary Ezzell; Bruce A Faddegon; Iwan Kawrakow; Paul J Keall; Helen Liu; C M Charlie Ma; D W O Rogers; Jan Seuntjens; Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Depth of ionization chamber in water.

Authors:  R C Tailor; V M Tello
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  35 in total

1.  Polarity correction factor for flattening filter free photon beams in several cylindrical ionization chambers.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Ogata; Kazuyuki Uehara; Masao Nakayama; Shinji Tsudou; Takashi Masutani; Takanobu Okayama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-02-12

2.  Direct megavoltage photon calibration service in Australia.

Authors:  D J Butler; G Ramanathan; C Oliver; A Cole; J Lye; P D Harty; T Wright; D V Webb; D S Followill
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.430

3.  Uncertainty in positioning ion chamber at reference depth for various water phantoms.

Authors:  Naoki Kinoshita; Hiroshi Oguchi; Toshiki Adachi; Hiroki Shioura; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-03-30

4.  Dose accuracy improvement on head and neck VMAT treatments by using the Acuros algorithm and accurate FFF beam calibration.

Authors:  Guadalupe Martin-Martin; Stefan Walter; Eduardo Guibelalde
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Survey on utilization of flattening filter-free photon beams in Japan.

Authors:  Takumi Kodama; Keisuke Yasui; Shie Nishioka; Kazunori Miyaura; Toru Takakura; Tetsurou Katayose; Mitsuhiro Nakamura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Examining electrometer performance checks with direct-current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks.

Authors:  Naoki Kinoshita; Hiroshi Oguchi; Morihito Shimizu; Eiji Kidoya; Hiroki Shioura; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Insight gained from responses to surveys on reference dosimetry practices.

Authors:  Bryan Muir; Wesley Culberson; Stephen Davis; Gwe-Ya Kim; Yimei Huang; Sung-Woo Lee; Jessica Lowenstein; Arman Sarfehnia; Jeffrey Siebers; Naresh Tolani
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.

Authors:  Moti R Paudel; Anthony Kim; Arman Sarfehnia; Sayed B Ahmad; David J Beachey; Arjun Sahgal; Brian M Keller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Pion effects in flattening filter-free radiation beams.

Authors:  Robert A Corns; Vicky W Huang; Steven D Thomas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Step-size effect on calculated photon and electron beam Cherenkov-to-dose conversion factors.

Authors:  Yana Zlateva; Bryan R Muir; Issam El Naqa; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.