Literature DB >> 14516219

Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.

Richard L Marsh1, Jason L Hicks, Gabriel I Cook, Jeffrey S Hansen, Andrew L Pallos.   

Abstract

Previous studies of event-based prospective memory have demonstrated that the character of an ongoing task can affect cue detection. By contrast, this study demonstrated that there is a reciprocal relationship insofar as cue-verification and response-retrieval processes interfered with making a response in the ongoing task. The amount of interference was determined by the type of intention, which was manipulated to affect the complexity of verification and retrospective response retrieval. These relationships were true even when the interference caused by cue detection was separated from a more general effect to ongoing-task performance caused by shifts in attentional allocation policies. The results have theoretical implications for models that attempt to specify the cognitive microstructure of event-based prospective memory. (c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516219     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  57 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  Cognitive exertion and subsequent intention execution in older adults.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Michael J Cahill; Janet S Singer; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

5.  Resource depletion does not influence prospective memory in college students.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Michael J Cahill; Hillary G Mullet; Michael K Scullin; Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-09-08

6.  Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

7.  Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West; Jason Krompinger; Ritvij Bowry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

8.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

9.  ERPs and their brain sources in perceptual and conceptual prospective memory tasks: Commonalities and differences between the two tasks.

Authors:  Gabriela Cruz; Makoto Miyakoshi; Scott Makeig; Kerry Kilborn; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Michael S Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.