Literature DB >> 19447818

Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies.

Simon M Walker1, Adrian L R Thomas, Graham K Taylor.   

Abstract

Here, we present a detailed analysis of the deforming wing kinematics of free-flying hoverflies (Eristalis tenax, Linnaeus) during hovering flight. We used four high-speed digital video cameras to reconstruct the motion of approximately 22 points on each wing using photogrammetric techniques. While the root-flapping motion of the wing is similar in both the downstroke and upstroke, and is well modelled as a simple harmonic motion, other wing kinematic parameters show substantial variation between the downstroke and upstroke. Whereas the magnitude of the angle of incidence varies considerably within and between different hoverflies, the twist distribution along the wing is highly stereotyped. The angle of incidence and camber both show a recoil effect as they change abruptly at stroke reversal. Pronation occurs consistently after stroke reversal, which is perhaps surprising, because this has been found to reduce lift production in modelling studies. We find that the alula, a hinged flap near the base of the wing, operates in two discrete states: either in plane with the wing, or flipped approximately normal to it. We hypothesize that the alula may be acting as a flow-control device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19447818      PMCID: PMC2839382          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  19 in total

1.  On aerodynamic modelling of an insect-like flapping wing in hover for micro air vehicles.

Authors:  Rafał Zbikowski
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing.

Authors:  Marcos Vanella; Timothy Fitzgerald; Sergio Preidikman; Elias Balaras; Balakumar Balachandran
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A two-dimensional computational study on the fluid-structure interaction cause of wing pitch changes in dipteran flapping flight.

Authors:  Daisuke Ishihara; T Horie; Mitsunori Denda
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Fly photoreceptors. II. Spectral and polarized light sensitivity in the drone fly Eristalis.

Authors:  G A Horridge; K Mimura; Y Tsukahara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1975-07-01

6.  The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steven N Fry; Rosalyn Sayaman; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann; Simon Pick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies.

Authors:  Yanpeng Liu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Jian Tang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  20 in total

1.  Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects.

Authors:  Jiang Hao Wu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.

Authors:  Tuyen Quang Le; Tien Van Truong; Soo Hyung Park; Tri Quang Truong; Jin Hwan Ko; Hoon Cheol Park; Doyoung Byun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Using computational and mechanical models to study animal locomotion.

Authors:  Laura A Miller; Daniel I Goldman; Tyson L Hedrick; Eric D Tytell; Z Jane Wang; Jeannette Yen; Silas Alben
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Analytical model for instantaneous lift and shape deformation of an insect-scale flapping wing in hover.

Authors:  Chang-kwon Kang; Wei Shyy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Motor output and control input in flapping flight: a compact model of the deforming wing kinematics of manoeuvring hoverflies.

Authors:  Indira Nagesh; Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Operation of the alula as an indicator of gear change in hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Study of Mosquito Aerodynamics for Imitation as a Small Robot and Flight in a Low-Density Environment.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Noorfaizal Yidris; Adi Azriff Basri; Raghuvir Pai; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Time-varying wing-twist improves aerodynamic efficiency of forward flight in butterflies.

Authors:  Lingxiao Zheng; Tyson L Hedrick; Rajat Mittal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.