Literature DB >> 15939772

The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila.

Steven N Fry1, Rosalyn Sayaman, Michael H Dickinson.   

Abstract

Using 3D infrared high-speed video, we captured the continuous wing and body kinematics of free-flying fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, during hovering and slow forward flight. We then 'replayed' the wing kinematics on a dynamically scaled robotic model to measure the aerodynamic forces produced by the wings. Hovering animals generate a U-shaped wing trajectory, in which large drag forces during a downward plunge at the start of each stroke create peak vertical forces. Quasi-steady mechanisms could account for nearly all of the mean measured force required to hover, although temporal discrepancies between instantaneous measured forces and model predictions indicate that unsteady mechanisms also play a significant role. We analyzed the requirements for hovering from an analysis of the time history of forces and moments in all six degrees of freedom. The wing kinematics necessary to generate sufficient lift are highly constrained by the requirement to balance thrust and pitch torque over the stroke cycle. We also compare the wing motion and aerodynamic forces of free and tethered flies. Tethering causes a strong distortion of the stroke pattern that results in a reduction of translational forces and a prominent nose-down pitch moment. The stereotyped distortion under tethered conditions is most likely due to a disruption of sensory feedback. Finally, we calculated flight power based directly on the measurements of wing motion and aerodynamic forces, which yielded a higher estimate of muscle power during free hovering flight than prior estimates based on time-averaged parameters. This discrepancy is mostly due to a two- to threefold underestimate of the mean profile drag coefficient in prior studies. We also compared our values with the predictions of the same time-averaged models using more accurate kinematic and aerodynamic input parameters based on our high-speed videography measurements. In this case, the time-averaged models tended to overestimate flight costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15939772     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  54 in total

1.  Frequency response of lift control in Drosophila.

Authors:  Chauncey F Graetzel; Bradley J Nelson; Steven N Fry
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Dynamics of optomotor responses in Drosophila to perturbations in optic flow.

Authors:  Jamie C Theobald; Dario L Ringach; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Flight and seizure motor patterns in Drosophila mutants: simultaneous acoustic and electrophysiological recordings of wing beats and flight muscle activity.

Authors:  Atulya Iyengar; Chun-Fang Wu
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.250

4.  Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Scaling law and enhancement of lift generation of an insect-size hovering flexible wing.

Authors:  Chang-kwon Kang; Wei Shyy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Wing and body motion and aerodynamic and leg forces during take-off in droneflies.

Authors:  Mao Wei Chen; Yan Lai Zhang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Running hot and cold: behavioral strategies, neural circuits, and the molecular machinery for thermotaxis in C. elegans and Drosophila.

Authors:  Paul A Garrity; Miriam B Goodman; Aravinthan D Samuel; Piali Sengupta
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Qingfeng Huang; Xinyan Deng; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Role of calcium in the regulation of mechanical power in insect flight.

Authors:  Shefa Gordon; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.