Literature DB >> 17401119

The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings.

Fritz-Olaf Lehmann1, Simon Pick.   

Abstract

Flying insects may enhance their flight force production by contralateral wing interaction during dorsal stroke reversal ('clap-and-fling'). In this study, we explored the forces and moments due to clap-and-fling at various wing tip trajectories, employing a dynamically scaled electromechanical flapping device. The 17 tested bio-inspired kinematic patterns were identical in stroke amplitude, stroke frequency and angle of attack with respect to the horizontal stroke plane but varied in heaving motion. Clap-and-fling induced vertical force augmentation significantly decreased with increasing vertical force production averaged over the entire stroke cycle, whereas total force augmentation was independent from changes in force produced by a single wing. Vertical force augmentation was also largely independent of forces produced due to wing rotation at the stroke reversals, the sum of rotational circulation and wake capture force. We obtained maximum (17.4%) and minimum (1.4%) vertical force augmentation in two types of figure-eight stroke kinematics whereby rate and direction of heaving motion during fling may explain 58% of the variance in vertical force augmentation. This finding suggests that vertical wing motion distinctly alters the flow regime at the beginning of the downstroke. Using an analytical model, we determined pitching moments acting on an imaginary body of the flapping device from the measured time course of forces, the changes in length of the force vector's moment arm, the position of the centre of mass and body angle. The data show that pitching moments are largely independent from mean vertical force; however, clap-and-fling reinforces mean pitching moments by approximately 21%, compared to the moments produced by a single flapping wing. Pitching moments due to clap-and-fling significantly increase with increasing vertical force augmentation and produce nose-down moments in most of the tested patterns. The analytical model, however, shows that algebraic sign and magnitude of these moments may vary distinctly depending on both body angle and the distance between the wing hinge and the animal's centre of mass. Altogether, the data suggest that the benefit of clap-and-fling wing beat for vertical force enhancement and pitch balance may change with changing heaving motion and thus wing tip trajectory during manoeuvring flight. We hypothesize that these dependencies may have shaped the evolution of wing kinematics in insects that are limited by aerodynamic lift rather than by mechanical power of their flight musculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401119     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 4.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

5.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a feathered dinosaur measured using physical models. Effects of form on static stability and control effectiveness.

Authors:  Dennis Evangelista; Griselda Cardona; Eric Guenther-Gleason; Tony Huynh; Austin Kwong; Dylan Marks; Neil Ray; Adrian Tisbe; Kyle Tse; Mimi Koehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Wing-kinematics measurement and aerodynamics in a small insect in hovering flight.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Mao Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Aerodynamic forces and flows of the full and partial clap-fling motions in insects.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Mao Sun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Study of Mosquito Aerodynamics for Imitation as a Small Robot and Flight in a Low-Density Environment.

Authors:  Balbir Singh; Noorfaizal Yidris; Adi Azriff Basri; Raghuvir Pai; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  The generation of forces and moments during visual-evoked steering maneuvers in flying Drosophila.

Authors:  Hiroki Sugiura; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Neural control and precision of flight muscle activation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann; Jan Bartussek
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.